Shanti Bill - India's Nuclear Power Law
Aasaan Bhasha Mein (English)December 21, 202500:02:38

Shanti Bill - India's Nuclear Power Law

The Sustainable Harnessing and Advancement of Nuclear Energy for Transforming India (SHANTI) Bill, 2025, marks a historic overhaul of India’s atomic energy landscape. By repealing and consolidating the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 and the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act (CLNDA), 2010, it shifts India from a state monopoly to a regulated, multi-player ecosystem. Viksit Bharat @2047: Aims to scale India’s nuclear capacity from ~8.1 GW to 100 GW by 2047 to provide clean, baseload power for advanced tech like AI and quantum computing. Deregulation: Ends decades of exclusive state control by allowing private companies and joint ventures to build and operate nuclear plants. Modernization: Updates 60-year-old laws to align with global safety standards (IAEA) and contemporary technological realities like Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). Unified Framework: Consolidates regulation, enforcement, civil liability, and dispute resolution into a single statute to eliminate legal ambiguity. Statutory Regulator: Grants the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) independent statutory status. It now has the legal teeth to inspect, investigate, and shut down non-compliant facilities without needing executive approval. Dual Authorization: Shifts from a one-time permission model to a continuous one. Operators now need both a license to operate and a separate, independent safety authorization for every phase—from construction to decommissioning. Appellate Mechanism: Establishes the Atomic Energy Redressal Advisory Council for disputes, with further appeals directed to the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL). Pragmatic Liability Regime: Replaces the flat ₹1,500 crore cap with a tiered structure based on reactor capacity, ranging from ₹100 crore to ₹3,000 crore. Supplier Protection: Significantly, the Bill removes the controversial "Right of Recourse" (Section 17b of the old CLNDA) against equipment suppliers. This aims to attract global technology partners (like US-based firms) who were previously deterred by unlimited liability risks. Nuclear Liability Fund: The government will bear liability exceeding the operator’s cap and may establish a dedicated fund pooled through power tariffs. Expanded Scope: For the first time, the definition of "nuclear damage" is expanded to include environmental damage and potential claims in foreign territories caused by an incident in India. Strategic Reservation: While private players can operate plants, the "Core" of the fuel cycle remains a government monopoly: Uranium Enrichment Spent-Fuel Reprocessing Heavy Water Production High-level Waste Management National Security: Only Indian companies (no 100% foreign-owned entities) are eligible for licenses, ensuring sovereign oversight over sensitive technology. Strategic ObjectivesThe "Structural Shift" in GovernanceNuclear Liability and Risk ManagementSafeguards and Central Control

The Sustainable Harnessing and Advancement of Nuclear Energy for Transforming India (SHANTI) Bill, 2025, marks a historic overhaul of India’s atomic energy landscape. By repealing and consolidating the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 and the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act (CLNDA), 2010, it shifts India from a state monopoly to a regulated, multi-player ecosystem.

  • Viksit Bharat @2047: Aims to scale India’s nuclear capacity from ~8.1 GW to 100 GW by 2047 to provide clean, baseload power for advanced tech like AI and quantum computing.

  • Deregulation: Ends decades of exclusive state control by allowing private companies and joint ventures to build and operate nuclear plants.

  • Modernization: Updates 60-year-old laws to align with global safety standards (IAEA) and contemporary technological realities like Small Modular Reactors (SMRs).

  • Unified Framework: Consolidates regulation, enforcement, civil liability, and dispute resolution into a single statute to eliminate legal ambiguity.

  • Statutory Regulator: Grants the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) independent statutory status. It now has the legal teeth to inspect, investigate, and shut down non-compliant facilities without needing executive approval.

  • Dual Authorization: Shifts from a one-time permission model to a continuous one. Operators now need both a license to operate and a separate, independent safety authorization for every phase—from construction to decommissioning.

  • Appellate Mechanism: Establishes the Atomic Energy Redressal Advisory Council for disputes, with further appeals directed to the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL).

  • Pragmatic Liability Regime: Replaces the flat ₹1,500 crore cap with a tiered structure based on reactor capacity, ranging from ₹100 crore to ₹3,000 crore.

  • Supplier Protection: Significantly, the Bill removes the controversial "Right of Recourse" (Section 17b of the old CLNDA) against equipment suppliers. This aims to attract global technology partners (like US-based firms) who were previously deterred by unlimited liability risks.

  • Nuclear Liability Fund: The government will bear liability exceeding the operator’s cap and may establish a dedicated fund pooled through power tariffs.

  • Expanded Scope: For the first time, the definition of "nuclear damage" is expanded to include environmental damage and potential claims in foreign territories caused by an incident in India.

  • Strategic Reservation: While private players can operate plants, the "Core" of the fuel cycle remains a government monopoly:

    • Uranium Enrichment

    • Spent-Fuel Reprocessing

    • Heavy Water Production

    • High-level Waste Management

  • National Security: Only Indian companies (no 100% foreign-owned entities) are eligible for licenses, ensuring sovereign oversight over sensitive technology.

Strategic ObjectivesThe "Structural Shift" in GovernanceNuclear Liability and Risk ManagementSafeguards and Central Control