This week on TRF we cover:
- When your Linked In post gets hi-jacked, it can be a complement or just annoying. What was Barry thinking, his //bit.ly would create an avalanche of qualified candidates?
- Congrats to one of the OG's of HR podcasting, Matt Alder hits 600 episodes.
In the news
- Federal minimum wage in Canada jumps to $17.30. Sad to see the US federal minimum wage still sits at $7.25 per hour.
- Realtors in the US are facing some drastic changes that will hit their commissions. There should be an app for this! No one ever felt good about paying $25,000 to someone for selling their biggest investment - your home.
- NASA vs SpaceX. It all comes down to hiring and perhaps keeping costs in line. Consider their spending habits over the last 10 years, NASA clocked in at $21.2 BILLION and SpaceX at $500-750 million.
Tip of the Week
- Recruiters being interviewed by a Recruiter for a recruiting role, feels like jedi mind trick. Showing up isn't what you wear, it's asking great questions.
Recruiting Insights
- Glassdoor controversy this week. Adding the Fishbowl means you give your identifying information sparks fear into the hearts of some users that employers will someone find you out for the nasty review you left.
- Global Trends Report 2024 from HireVue uses an impressive survey size of 6,000 leaders. 2 things stood out, skills based hiring to identify transferable skills and getting comfortable with using AI.
- Boomerang employees have risen by more than 30% since Covid with half of them returning within 2 years of leaving.
[00:00:00] This week on The Recruitment Flex, should real estate agents be replaced with an app? NASA
[00:00:07] can't compete with SpaceX on pay. That's probably a good thing. There's no need for
[00:00:14] glass tour users to panic. Plus, time to welcome boomerang employees, tear
[00:00:19] up with my dad and Shelley start right now.
[00:00:29] Welcome to The Recruitment Flex with Serge and Shelley, I'm Serge.
[00:00:33] And I'm Shelley, and we talk all things recruitment starting right now.
[00:00:41] Bonjour and welcome to The Recruitment Flex, Shelley. How you doing?
[00:00:46] Doing really good. I'm actually taking some time off. I know. I was
[00:00:50] of course. Yeah, I am because I'm booking interviews and stuff.
[00:00:55] Actually, I'm on vacation. We've been doing this for four years, Shelley.
[00:00:59] I've never seen you actually do a vacation at your staying local. It's pretty rare.
[00:01:04] Yes. Yes. I'm actually really excited about it even though I'm not going anywhere
[00:01:09] sexier, glamorous. But my favorite auntie is coming up from Fort Knox, Kentucky.
[00:01:17] So she's coming up to visit. She's not been to Canada in 10 years.
[00:01:22] Kentucky? I don't think I've ever met anyone from Kentucky. She's going to find
[00:01:26] it a culture shock here especially if we still have snow on the ground which we do right now.
[00:01:31] I know. I've been sending her pictures.
[00:01:34] And I'm like, don't worry. It'll all be gone by next Wednesday.
[00:01:37] So I hope you had fun with your auntie. I know. And I'm glad that you're taking some time off.
[00:01:43] Are you still going to host or should I find another host for those couple of weeks?
[00:01:47] We've got it covered. We've got it covered. Her plane doesn't come in till noon and we'll record
[00:01:51] a little bit earlier. That is right. Shelley, one thing that I've noticed recently,
[00:01:57] I don't know if you've seen the same on LinkedIn. I spend a lot of time there. And I'm seeing a lot
[00:02:02] influencers having their posts what I call hijacked. So people putting random messages,
[00:02:08] promoting their company. And recently I've seen that recruiters are just going in the comments
[00:02:13] and putting, I have these roles to hire. And happened to us last week where someone just hijacked
[00:02:19] one of our recruitment flex posts and basically put some random roles that I don't even know where
[00:02:26] they're at. And like, does this work? What is this strategy seems crazy? And like, Shelley,
[00:02:32] I've noticed that this has been happening from companies commenting on our posts and it's obviously
[00:02:37] AI because it's not even close to the highlights of what we posted. What is going on? It must work if
[00:02:45] people are doing this or just another way to spam. Well, I saw Mr. Barry Beckner. Don't know who
[00:02:52] you're calling him out. Barry Beckner. Anybody can go look at our post and see that Barry Beckner,
[00:02:58] a recruiter from God knows where the middle of nowhere USA decided to post his job ad which is
[00:03:06] so badly done. Clearly a hijack. And clearly something that he believes is a strategy. So hey,
[00:03:13] Barry, what's up? What the hell? And I don't think it's a bot surge. No, no, this case is not a bot.
[00:03:20] I don't think it's AI. I think it is somebody and I bet if you asked him, he would think he's
[00:03:25] doing us a favor. That somehow he's bringing us more traffic because he's so popular. Yeah.
[00:03:32] No idea. It's so weird to see it in the comments. Well, and things is what gives staffing a bad
[00:03:42] reputation. There's no strategy. It's just like pump everything out put in front of everyone and hope
[00:03:48] someone sees it and wants to apply for the job. It's not strategic. I'm like, he's probably trying
[00:03:54] to figure out LinkedIn. Someone told him that this is a hack that you can use so he's trying it.
[00:04:00] I don't think he came up with this like in the picture. He looks like he's 72. So
[00:04:06] I don't know. It's a good, it's probably the best picture he has of himself. Honestly,
[00:04:10] yeah. Yeah. No, the best analogy is this surge. It's equivalent to hiring a helicopter
[00:04:17] with a thousand loose leaf pieces of paper to drop over the parking lot at Chinook Mall on a
[00:04:24] Saturday and hope that flyer lands on the windshield of somebody who is a cybersecurity software
[00:04:30] specialist. That's the strategy here, Barry. Listen, why don't you just hire yourself a helicopter
[00:04:36] and drop pamphlets? I think that helicopter ID is a way better ID. I think that would work
[00:04:42] way more like it's a recruitment flex account. We get decent traffic on it, but it's not like
[00:04:47] millions of people, right? Like you're not hitting a massive audience. So whatever don't care, but
[00:04:55] if you're a recruiter and you're doing this, it's pretty stupid. And when I see it, I'm like,
[00:05:00] I'm supposed to. But on the other side of just fantastic, Matt Alder, our friend at recruiting
[00:05:08] future one of the best if not the best podcast in this industry, he is celebrating his 600 episode.
[00:05:19] 600 episode is insane. Anyone that does podcast saying knows how much work that he has put in. So
[00:05:26] congratulations, Matt. Well, deserve keep doing what you're doing because we love your podcast.
[00:05:31] And if you're listening and you haven't heard of it, recruiting future based in UK, Matt has
[00:05:37] the best accent like I just could listen to him talk all day. So congratulations, Matt. Yeah.
[00:05:43] And he does it solo. He does. Everyone else in the podcast world were paired up, right? Yeah.
[00:05:49] And I tried and cheesed. There's a few other solos, but they're not as consistent as Matt
[00:05:55] Alder. And you're right. He has a lovely accent. So congratulations for me as well, Matt.
[00:06:01] Is that you're really encouraging because there is some weeks. I'm like, what are we going to
[00:06:05] talk about again? And it shows that we have at least 300 more episodes of content if he could do it.
[00:06:13] Yeah, I guess it's good news and add in. Yes. Michelle, let's jump into the news.
[00:06:20] All right. Here in Canada, federal minimum wage is going up to $17.30 an hour as of April 1st.
[00:06:29] So the government of Canada introduced a federal minimum wage in 2021. And they actually set out
[00:06:36] a schedule of what it was going to increase and when because in 2022, the federal minimum wage was
[00:06:42] 1555. And in 23, it went to 1665. And now it's $17.30. Do you know what the minimum wage in the US is?
[00:06:54] It's shocking. Can I guess? I'm going to guess. Yeah, just guess. My guess is that this is the
[00:07:01] federal minimum wage, not state by state because it's different every state. So apples to apples,
[00:07:06] I believe it's somewhere around $7. Federal ding ding ding ding. $7.25. And just to your point,
[00:07:16] Shelley, I think there is a federal minimum wage, but there's also provincial and provincial can be
[00:07:22] a little bit lower. This is for any federally regulated company or the federal government, right?
[00:07:28] But on average, I don't think there's a province in Canada that is under $15 right now.
[00:07:34] So massive difference between the US $7.25 and $17 is the difference.
[00:07:41] Absolutely crazy to me. And $17. Let's put in context. And all fairness are costs of living here
[00:07:48] in Canada is higher than the US, but that's a huge difference. How do you live on $7.25?
[00:07:54] How do you live on $17 an hour in this current economy? I don't know how anyone does it,
[00:08:00] but I'm glad we're putting in minimums that actually kind of makes sense in my opinion.
[00:08:07] Can I just add one thing? Because I think I know how people are surviving
[00:08:11] and that really explains what we reported on last week about gig workers and fiber and
[00:08:16] upwork. But even more so when we look at the gig economy, I watched a YouTube short yesterday
[00:08:23] where a financial advisor is doing one-on-ones. Now and I don't know if this true,
[00:08:30] but if you're an Uber Eats driver or skip the dishes driver and you hustle,
[00:08:35] you can make 80,000 a year. But you got to hustle. Like this is not a maybe don't feel like it today,
[00:08:43] but these are drivers that really hustle. Take the peak hours, they're always available.
[00:08:50] They've made it their full-time job. I think one day we have to have a discussion. We won't do it today,
[00:08:55] but on the hold Uber Eats, skip the dishes, door dash, that whole business to me is
[00:09:02] absolutely crazy paying $40 for a smoothie to get delivered to your houses. If you shut the
[00:09:07] munchies, they'll do it. Oh of course they'll do it. It coincides with the legalization of cannabis.
[00:09:14] Smart because we don't want you to drive. If you've got the munchies paying $40 for a slurpee and
[00:09:20] a hot dog, you know what? They'll do it. No, well I see it. I see my neighbor ordering door dash
[00:09:28] every night and I'm just like man that must get crazy expensive. And I get it like making food
[00:09:35] and everything takes time. And if you're using that time to do something more productive, yes,
[00:09:41] but in general if you're eating door dash all the time is crazy expensive. And there is someone
[00:09:48] that I know that I always saw eat door dash and I'm like dude let's log into your door dash account
[00:09:54] or skip the dishes. And in two and a half years he had ordered skip the dishes 300 times.
[00:10:04] 300 times and just over two years you're basically paying double for the same amount of food
[00:10:11] and then you're tipping. That whole world doesn't make any sense to me but that's a topic for
[00:10:16] a different day. Topic I do want to talk about pretty interesting. Thank you. Is the real estate
[00:10:23] changes in the US? And how that could potentially impact what's going to happen here in Canada?
[00:10:30] Obviously the laws are different. But Shelley, before I go into context I want to give you maybe
[00:10:35] a little bit of my own personal thoughts on the whole real estate thing and this is where real estate
[00:10:42] agents have been the type of job that I'm like why have we replaced this with an app? You would think
[00:10:47] this is the perfect industry to disrupt because all the fundamentals around it are there right?
[00:10:54] The challenges of doing a real estate transaction is the paperwork but can't that be automated or at
[00:11:01] least given in a format that anyone can use like I see no reason why not. But the amount
[00:11:08] of money that you pay to a real estate agent just feels like a crime. So what they have done
[00:11:15] in the US is to decouple commissions for buyer and seller agents potentially leading to more buyers
[00:11:21] acting as their own agents and negotiations and commission rates becoming more flexible.
[00:11:27] Say the real estate commission is 6%. 3% would be going to the sellers agent and then 3%
[00:11:35] would be going to the buyers agent, right? And this was paid on the purchase of the house and
[00:11:41] it was paid by the seller. Always the seller got on the seller. So now that buyer commission
[00:11:49] they have to negotiate their own fee with a real estate agent. It's no longer split in between
[00:11:56] its decouple, they're not associated so I can now personally choose no I'm not going to use an
[00:12:02] agent or if I am going to use an agent and be like hey agent I'm going to pay you 0.5% of the
[00:12:08] transaction because now it is coming out of my pocket as in the past it was coming out of the
[00:12:14] seller. So major change and I'm just trying to put in perspective what is the value right?
[00:12:21] I can look on MLS, I can call and book my own viewings. Why would I pay potentially
[00:12:29] thousands of dollars to a real estate agent just seems completely crazy to me? I just don't feel
[00:12:36] they're bringing that value but like Shelley what's your thoughts here? I think it's going to have
[00:12:42] a huge impact because when you look at the real estate profession it is very common knowledge 80%
[00:12:51] of people who go into real estate do not make enough money to live on. There is a top 20%
[00:12:58] who do and they make a very good living and they're well established in their profession.
[00:13:05] I think what's going to happen is it is going to choke off the supply of anyone coming into the
[00:13:11] industry. Most people that I have ever met that are just getting in the real estate game
[00:13:18] have dollar signs in their eyes because they know that if they sell a house for $700,000 the
[00:13:25] realtor commission is 25,000 so 12,000 five goes to me right? So when you think about how much work
[00:13:32] you have to do even in my regular day-to-day job it's a huge amount of work for me to close a
[00:13:40] piece of business worth $25,000. In your pocket like 25 bucks? Yeah. In my pocket. Yeah. Mind you they
[00:13:46] only get 12,500 whatever what's going to happen is they're going to find fewer and fewer people will
[00:13:52] enter the profession of real estate. Will it go the way the Dodo bird you're absolutely right surge?
[00:13:58] You can idiot proof on an app that will walk somebody through how to list what to include,
[00:14:05] what not to include. What's important? How do arrange an inspection? How do arrange for condo
[00:14:12] documentation review because it's all spelled out like it really is so incredibly well-defined.
[00:14:20] It's really well-defined. So I love what you're saying. I think this is an industry that deserves
[00:14:26] to be disrupted. Yeah. For me to take a $25,000 reduction because they're negotiating the price too.
[00:14:34] They're setting the price. They're telling you based on this and this here's what we should list it for.
[00:14:40] And it's in their best interest not mine. No. The interests are not aligned. This is where I've had
[00:14:47] an issue with real estate for a long time. I'm on TikTok often and I found the gentleman called
[00:14:55] the older millennial explaining how I feel about real estate agents in that whole industry really well.
[00:15:02] Can we play? It's around two minutes. All right, let's play.
[00:15:07] I want to know what do you guys think realtors should be paid? Zero fucking dollars because being a
[00:15:11] realtor shouldn't even be a job anymore. I don't understand how we don't have a fucking app for this
[00:15:16] already. Like here if you're an app designer let me give you a billion dollar idea and just create
[00:15:20] an app where you can choose to be a buyer or a seller. And from that point the app takes you step by
[00:15:25] step through the process. Let's say you're a buyer, you go into the app put the area code that you
[00:15:29] want to buy a house in and everybody who's uploaded a seller on that platform shows up in that area
[00:15:35] and then the app hand walks you through the process and like I follow the bouncing ball type of format
[00:15:40] and instead of the current process of putting it in offer where you write an offer give it to your agent
[00:15:45] that agent then takes it to the sellers agent. The sellers agent then takes that to the sellers.
[00:15:49] The sellers then have a counter proposal which goes to their agent which then goes from that agent
[00:15:53] to your agent and then your agent goes and tells it to you and then you do that process over and over
[00:15:57] again until you all agree on something. How about I just put my offer in the app? You put a counter
[00:16:02] proposal and we go back and forth on that until we decide on a price and in there there are options for
[00:16:07] you pay my closing fees, you pay my inspection fee, you just add in all those little options so you can
[00:16:12] do that back and forth with the actual seller. Then once you've agreed to purchase the homes why don't
[00:16:16] you have a partnership with a company like eForms which can just draw you up a contract and put all your
[00:16:21] info in where it's supposed to be. Then you have a partnership with DocuSign so you can sign everything on
[00:16:25] the app, just have a step-by-step guide of what each side needs to do like the buyer is going to need
[00:16:30] to get an inspection within five days. Why not just have the app tell them they have to do that and
[00:16:35] then give them the local inspectors in their area so they can just directly contact them to do the
[00:16:40] inspection and then if one of these purchases gets too complicated you have it where they can hire
[00:16:44] real estate attorneys through the app. Guys simply do not fucking understand why realtors still a job.
[00:16:50] I certainly don't understand why they would be paid three to six percent of the cost of the home,
[00:16:54] everything a realtor does can be replaced in an app, everything. You could even set up the app so
[00:16:58] that it opens door locks on homes you're trying to door like you could do everything in an app that
[00:17:04] could cost $4.99 and that's $4.99 not $499 or the 4,000 or 15,000 your realtors trying to charge you.
[00:17:13] Do you understand the average cost of a home in the US right now is $400,000 means at best you're
[00:17:17] going to be paying $12,000 to a real estate agent and at worst you could be paying around 25 grand
[00:17:23] all for what because they took the time to learn the process that you can look up yourself all because
[00:17:27] they're doing something that should already be a fucking app. And here's the thing if you want real
[00:17:30] tor's to continue to be a job here so they should be paid they should have an hourly rate they should
[00:17:34] have to provide evidence of the hours they're working on my behalf simple as that if you want to make
[00:17:39] money do the actual work to earn it. So Shelley bang on right he's kind of cute
[00:17:48] yeah no I just think you just like look yeah exactly he looks like your type right but
[00:17:54] it's really nice I agree with his points completely and I think he's articulated how I feel about
[00:18:00] this whole industry in so many ways and like how do people end up in real estate?
[00:18:05] I know I investigated when I was younger and like seeing all these like fancy sports card
[00:18:11] do I'm like this seems like a really good gig then I realize you have to deal with people on a
[00:18:16] daily basis on their schedule and there's no way I'd like to do that. It's not for everybody. No
[00:18:24] real estate agents watch out that your days are numbered in my opinion in the US and it's coming
[00:18:30] to happen naturally search yeah because people will realize going in that there's not the big
[00:18:35] dollars I think that's why people do it and when you do anything just for the money
[00:18:40] it fizzles out pretty quick. I agree. So Shelley do you want to talk a little bit about SpaceX versus
[00:18:48] NASA? Yes really fun article I spotted it on HR grapevine where it talked about NASA versus SpaceX
[00:18:58] and NASA is winding and complaining that they can't compete with industry because the starting
[00:19:06] wage for an engineer at NASA is about 55,000 and SpaceX is paying 95 kind of no contest. So the
[00:19:16] salary comparison is one thing the industry growth is another and I love this article because
[00:19:22] what it really sang to me was if you want to work for a super intense guy Elon Musk
[00:19:30] who is going to get things done at a pace and do things at a fraction of the cost versus
[00:19:38] somebody who wants to work for a bloated federally owned and politically charged group like NASA.
[00:19:45] Right take your pick like it's a no-brainer this is employer brand at its best take the salary
[00:19:52] off the table because somebody who wants the safety and security of working for NASA
[00:19:58] okay then you'll work for half price that's what I got from it. Yeah it's interesting because
[00:20:05] I never considered that the salaries in NASA would be that much lower than what they are at
[00:20:11] SpaceX but that raises the question why are they competing in this industry like if there is a private
[00:20:20] operator that can do this at one tenth of the cost and actually execute and be successful doing it
[00:20:28] why is the government doing this? There's a lot of times that government institutions are created
[00:20:32] because there's no one in the private enterprise that could actually do it and he wasn't
[00:20:38] financially viable for a company to start building spaceships when NASA did so they created
[00:20:44] the industry but now it's time just to step aside and the reason I'm saying to step aside
[00:20:50] I'll give you the example. So NASA their heavy lift rocket called a space launch system has cost over
[00:20:58] $21.2 billion dollars right in 10 years of them building this and they still don't have
[00:21:04] a test trial there's still been no rocket up in the air compared to SpaceX so their heavy lift
[00:21:10] rocket which is the Falcon Heavy has a total seven landings under its belt and test flights that
[00:21:17] blown up not on purpose but they knew it was a high likelihood the cost of that has been between
[00:21:24] US 500 and 750 million it just shows the efficiency and the ability to get things done which a true
[00:21:34] entrepreneur like Elon Musk and we're not arguing about what Elon Musk says or does but as a
[00:21:41] pure entrepreneur he has been able to be way more efficient than government and to your point
[00:21:47] employment brand do you want to go work for an asshole like he is an asshole he's almost impossible
[00:21:55] to work for the intensity of the environment is there but you're actually getting things done
[00:22:01] and rockets are going up in the air and you're getting paid more because of it but it's not
[00:22:06] for everyone if you want to go in a safe space NASA is great you're just going to pay less no really
[00:22:13] good article Shelley let's dive into the tip of the week. Your tip of the week is brought to
[00:22:20] by Plum Plum knows that when people flourish businesses thrive using science backed insights
[00:22:26] Plum aligns human potential with job needs allowing you to build high performing teams from a
[00:22:31] single platform ideal for improving hiring choices identifying future leaders and offering
[00:22:37] personalized career advice Plum supports the entire employee journey from hire to retire
[00:22:44] discover more at plum.io so my tip of the week is us recruiters interviewing for a recruiter role
[00:22:52] we are held to a higher standard and we should be we're insiders and if you recruit and interview
[00:22:58] people for a living we are expecting you to ace the interview and showing up means being prepared
[00:23:05] researching the company and having thoughtful and insightful questions for hiring managers
[00:23:11] I always say that you can learn more about a candidate by the questions that they ask you so here's
[00:23:18] my tip of the week it's the best question to ask when it comes your turn to ask the hiring managers
[00:23:24] or the team here's the question if it were three months from now how would you know you've hired
[00:23:30] the right person what have they done in the role that you are so proud of your hiring decision
[00:23:37] and then stop talking and let them answer that's my tip of the week there is a lot of recruiters
[00:23:45] looking for jobs to good news so Shelley as I've been seeing like I'm linked in and I've
[00:23:50] fair amount of the ones that I know getting jobs in recruitment so there might be an upside but
[00:23:56] you're right let's jump into the recruiting insights brought to you by our friends at mit hova
[00:24:03] Shelley are you tired of the same old outsourcing woes well say hello to near shoring it's like
[00:24:10] outsourcing but closer and it won't make you pull your hair out picture this top notch i.t talent
[00:24:16] from latin america many latin american it professionals have strong english language skills
[00:24:22] and even live in the same time zone so no more midnight conference calls how the luya plus latin
[00:24:29] america's growing tech ecosystem strong educational institutions and a pool of skilled it professionals
[00:24:36] make it the perfect region for recruiting talent i have the perfect company that does this and
[00:24:42] companies name is mit hova they have local experts who handle everything from recruiting to
[00:24:48] HR support so why settle for the same old outsourcing blues when you can have the near shoring party
[00:24:55] with mit hova looked them up at mit hova.com and let's get the fiesta started
[00:25:03] alright Shelley this has been everywhere it's the recent changes at glass door i'm not
[00:25:10] exactly sure it changes but here is what's caused a little bit of a panic so glass door known for
[00:25:16] allowing anonymous employee reviews to started adding real names to user profiles without consent
[00:25:24] glass doors acquisition of fish bowl a professional networking app requiring identity verification
[00:25:30] change its term of service to necessitate user verification so basically what happened here
[00:25:36] is they've been merging the glass door in a fish bowl accounts together creating a profile name
[00:25:43] so in the past when you're adding your glass door review they still verify you right you need
[00:25:49] to put your email address of where you were do you need to be able to verify that you actually
[00:25:55] worked there did they ask you for your name and any additional information no in general they
[00:26:03] did not fish bowl does require that information and now they've merged that together the challenge
[00:26:09] in where i think this is god in way overblown is people have the assumption now that suddenly all
[00:26:15] the reviews that they put their names are going to be associated with and that is just not the case
[00:26:21] from everything i'm reading your reviews are still completely anonymous this is a nothing burger to
[00:26:27] me i don't think it's a big deal but it's definitely causing a lot of i guess concern
[00:26:34] nothing burger no i've had a glass door profile for so long i really had to challenge my memory banks
[00:26:48] to think about when i first registered and built a profile
[00:26:52] now i swear i did have to give them my name because if i'm going to provide a review for my employer
[00:27:00] how else would they validate that i actually worked there like you can't log in with a
[00:27:05] nothing burger one two three at gmail.com and start hacking and burning down employers that you've
[00:27:14] never worked for so i do remember building a profile because it has stuck with me ever since that
[00:27:20] there had to be some way to validate now have you been on fishbowl search have you have you
[00:27:26] okay yeah so on fishbowl it has your first name and your initial or whatever yeah so to participate in
[00:27:33] these groups you have to show that you've got interest in say HR management or recruitment or
[00:27:40] whatever right so you're opting into a group and then you can chime in and provide advice
[00:27:46] or what have you i don't see another way to do it because otherwise it just could be some random
[00:27:53] right providing advice it's not like i can see you commenting on a fishbowl thread and i'm going
[00:28:01] to naturally draw the conclusion that was you that left a bad review over at and max.com
[00:28:08] you are right but it only asked your email address and never asked your name your last name or
[00:28:13] anything like that the address had to be verified from what i remember but that's it the other factor
[00:28:20] is like how relevant is glass door anymore and we won't argue at point why not i would actually
[00:28:29] challenge you to say that in some industry sectors glass door reviews are super relevant
[00:28:37] and they're on the upswing yeah your propaganda doesn't work with me is definitely not there's
[00:28:43] no relevancy the glass door is replaced by take talk when it comes to people going out there and
[00:28:49] sharing your real feelings and i just don't see the relevance of last group you know what that's a
[00:28:55] really excellent point i think there is a certain demographic that will stay loyal to glass door
[00:29:01] and it's part of the job-seeker journey you just want to validate is this rant on tick-tock
[00:29:06] valid and then you go look at their reviews on various sites and it's kind of a consistent theme
[00:29:12] i think it'll stay part of the journey of somebody who's top talent wanting to change jobs or
[00:29:20] considering making a move good point i am full of those shally let's move on to the next
[00:29:28] recruiting insight okay you know me in my reports yeah you love reports so i found a wonderful
[00:29:36] report here this is the global trends of 2024 report which is 6,000 T.A. leaders from around the
[00:29:46] world and it's an extensive report so i cherry pick the things that i think i'm interested in i think
[00:29:53] our audience is interested in successful workplaces in 2024 this is just again more data supporting
[00:30:00] that skills-based hiring is on the upswing and artificial intelligence so i just wanted to speak
[00:30:06] to those couple of topics because this survey 96% of respondents like this a huge number it's
[00:30:15] staggering said that they are now looking at candidates ability to learn new skills while assessing
[00:30:22] their skills that transfer to new responsibilities as roles evolve over time so how do you do that
[00:30:30] how do you determine not just their current skills but their ability to learn new skills
[00:30:36] that is the secret sauce and being able to identify transferable skills that encourage employees
[00:30:43] pursue roles that they may have otherwise not a thought about so the trend that we're seeing is
[00:30:51] that companies are starting to look inside first who are those potentials and the measurement of
[00:30:59] potential is are you trainable do you have what it takes to learn new skills as part of their
[00:31:07] assessment so i thought that was super super industry on this topic the other thing i really liked was
[00:31:13] 65% currently use skill assessments specifically to determine somebody's potential
[00:31:21] hmm i love shelly that you did not mention who the report was written by but let's give them credit
[00:31:29] it's higher view it's a really good report because you're right it has six thousand talent acquisition
[00:31:35] leaders which is a great sample size i want to talk about the last point you had as far as the
[00:31:41] identifying transferable skills it's like going back to the 80s 70s 50s that's how companies used
[00:31:50] to hire and promote people most of the roles were not external they were all internal to get a new
[00:31:59] role you'd start at the bottom develop your skills get promoted go in different roles that's how
[00:32:04] corporate work right overall and that's why people stayed in company for a really long time because
[00:32:10] there was a natural progression the job boards change all of that and i'm not saying this as a
[00:32:16] negative as you know i'm a job board guy but it did change because the options that are out there
[00:32:21] for its candidates companies start thinking well it's easier just to hire someone with the skill
[00:32:27] which was never how we did it for centuries we basically hired a person groomed them train them
[00:32:35] gave them the skills and then put them in those roles and the new junior people would come in and
[00:32:42] start the same journey obviously the world the economy there's been a global transformation as far
[00:32:47] as like how we work that's changed it as well but i love that we're thinking about this again that hey
[00:32:54] yeah maybe this person doesn't have that specific skills that were not trained but look they have
[00:33:01] this and this and we can train them they have the institutional knowledge they know how to make
[00:33:06] their way through a company to go to the right person there's so many advantages of doing that
[00:33:11] so i'm glad they called that out definitely good to go back in history sometimes everything that's old
[00:33:18] is new again yes what a perfect segue shelly because i want to talk about boomerang employees
[00:33:27] there's a really cool article that you shared here tonight it's not something i even considered
[00:33:32] because during the 2021-2022 we were love bombing a whole lot the market was extremely hot companies
[00:33:43] were recruiting like crazy and we were throwing all this money into your earlier point if you're
[00:33:49] just taking the job for the money you're going to burn out at one particular point or it's not
[00:33:54] going to be as green then you have all these companies advertising that they're the greatest place to
[00:33:59] work then you start working there and month in you're like oh shit i got do and i think that's
[00:34:07] what's happened so to give you an idea of what that looks like employees who return to their
[00:34:12] former employer after having previously left her position as increased by around thirding percent
[00:34:19] following the pandemic and the great resignation i think the sector does increase by far the most
[00:34:25] is sectors with high seasonalities such as accommodations and food and services and retail
[00:34:32] not surprised by this i think we're seeing a lot more of this that got attracted by
[00:34:39] tons of opportunities more money thinking this is going to be something different i want to change my
[00:34:44] life i'm going to take this job then quickly realizing hey maybe i was better off at the company
[00:34:50] they treated me well they paid me fairly i knew the people what's your take here shelly all of the
[00:34:56] above and i want to also add what was super cool about this study is they talked about when yeah
[00:35:03] so i know you said like a month in you realize oh the grass is in greener but how long do you stay
[00:35:10] yeah before you start romanticizing about your last employer and so this study answer that question
[00:35:16] is that half of them returned within two years of leaving and this is across all sectors so what
[00:35:23] is super interesting is prior to covid the boomerang a factor those that returned to a former employer
[00:35:31] hovered somewhere around two and a half percent and now in 2024 it is closer to 3.5 percent i know
[00:35:39] that's a big one percentage but when you look at the overall job market that is huge and yes
[00:35:47] there's an incredible spike of those people that left maybe the hourly or hospitality or seasonal
[00:35:53] workers yeah but they did track it all the way up to five years like you go and work somewhere else
[00:36:00] for up to five years and then come back shelly i think this goes to the point in thinking about
[00:36:07] how recruiters can take advantage of this and one of the things that i always focused on when
[00:36:13] I was leaving talent acquisition was creating a nalandai network right like a way to keep connected
[00:36:20] to these people formally or informally and obviously the better the workplace you were
[00:36:27] the more likelihood that you want to join that alumni and that you're happy that you worked there
[00:36:33] i still attend events for companies that i worked for 10 years ago because i'm still part of their
[00:36:40] facebook group and different things that i've been involved in what a great way to keep them engaged
[00:36:46] and when that time comes the recruiter reaching out being like hey if you're ever open like don't
[00:36:52] hesitate to reach out it's a great way to recruit people in my opinion it is because usually the
[00:36:57] reason you left isn't there anymore exactly exactly that's such a good point yes because it's usually
[00:37:04] the leader that you had that was holding you down and there's not there anymore would i go back oh my
[00:37:09] god i had such a good time such a good time did so many amazing things but you know what sometimes going
[00:37:17] backwards isn't a good thing yeah oh no and it's not always right but even if you don't hire i still
[00:37:24] think it's very valuable for you to stay connected with your employees that've been there before so
[00:37:29] i i don't think there's any harm in a alumni type network yeah all right shelly we've covered a lot
[00:37:36] again a couple things coming up we've got some hiring branch events coming up that we haven't locked
[00:37:41] in the day but it's coming an event with our friends at plumb in Toronto that were excited what's
[00:37:47] the date again shelly no second yes and it's gonna be like enviable seriously yes can you imagine being
[00:37:56] invited out with all of your peers these are all people that are thought leaders and at a very
[00:38:05] senior level in talent acquisition and that's who's on the list and then teague tackin washington dc
[00:38:14] in june and myself and shelly will be emcees for the event so please do get your ticket if you
[00:38:22] haven't i know they're running really tight right now they're almost sold out so go get your
[00:38:26] tickets quickly as possible on that note shelly have a fantastic weekend enjoy easter thank you good
[00:38:34] Friday and listeners thank you for listening happy easter our foie
[00:38:47] shelly let's face it taxing candidates is the easiest way to hire quicker today
[00:38:53] but your cell phone doesn't connect to your ats you're sharing your personal number with strangers
[00:38:58] is pretty scary right shelly and it's not even legally compliant this is where our friends at
[00:39:04] rec text come in they've created simple yet powerful text recruiting software that works with your
[00:39:10] ats plus it's designed by recruiters for recruiters so you know it works to learn more and book a
[00:39:18] demo visit www r-e-c-t-x-t.com mention the recruitment flex and get 10% off annual plans
[00:39:28] what was it like to be there for historical sports moments and unforgettable performances
[00:39:33] to be behind the scenes on press box access you'll hear from me Todd Jones and other sports
[00:39:38] writers about their experiences with the greatest athletes coaches and sports events
[00:39:43] at the past half century we'll share some stories behind the stories some big some small
[00:39:48] and some we've only told each other let us buy your round on press box access


