Happy International Women’s Day!
- After several attempts to invite women leaders in TA to be a guest on the podcast, we are asking for your help. Please send us nominations or referrals, we promise it will be fun!
In the News
- Vice.com lays off employees on a town hall zoom call with no preparation and a 2019 understanding of zoom features, like how to disable the emoji feature.
- Taking a page out of her own playbook as a Product Manager, Marta Puerto’s video goes viral on Linked In.
Tip of the Week
- The resourceful recruiter, follow layoff trackers and strict return to office mandates to know where talent will be more likely to depart.
https://talentedgeweekly.com/p/talent-edge-weekly-issue-226
Recruiting Insight
- LazyApply lives up to its name. Aki Ito test drives the bot who will apply for 750 jobs a day for you. It will be chaos for recruiters and for Aki Ito too!
- EY sets the pace for how to nurture a talent pool, by using their rejection email.
- Recruiting 101, exhaust the local market first before you undertake the expensive and time consuming task of relocation, immigration and 8 weeks to start.
[00:00:00] Bonjour and welcome to the recruitment flex. Shelly, happy International Women's Day.
[00:00:07] Thank you, sir. I know we're recording early, but when this show airs, the YWCA does a fundraiser
[00:00:16] every year called Y Whisper and Pamela Anderson is the keynote speaker. So I'm taking Brooklyn
[00:00:22] with me and I am so excited because although yes,
[00:00:26] she's a beautiful woman, but when you really listen to her story and what she was up against
[00:00:36] for all the scandals and her being blamed for the scandals and oh my goodness,
[00:00:41] they remind me what the scandals were again?
[00:00:45] Seriously?
[00:00:46] Oh, that's right.
[00:00:47] You were only in about grade two or grade three.
[00:00:50] So...
[00:00:51] So no, I'm kidding because Pamela Anderson was a big part of my teenage years.
[00:00:59] I had a really big poster of her in my room.
[00:01:03] So I was a big fan of Baywatch,
[00:01:05] a big fan of Pamela Anderson.
[00:01:07] And I was a big fan of one of those scandals actually.
[00:01:10] It made me feel less of a man for reasons
[00:01:14] that people would know the scandal.
[00:01:16] But yes, I am very well aware of that scandal
[00:01:18] that happened 20 years ago.
[00:01:20] Yeah, cause yes, her sons would be in their mid 20s
[00:01:23] and the boys were just little babies. I think when all of this was going down, maybe it's longer than that because it was just
[00:01:30] right when you were able to order off the internet. That was like the biggest thing was being able
[00:01:37] to buy this videotape off the internet. Like I remember seeing a Netflix documentary of her couple years ago or a show, was it a documentary?
[00:01:47] It was her own documentary.
[00:01:49] And I think when I watched it,
[00:01:51] I completely changed my opinion of her
[00:01:55] when I can relate to the struggles that women had
[00:02:00] and the level of patriarch that she faced from the public, that she faced even from her own circle of so-called friends, from the industry, and how she was one of the first to bring forward a lawsuit to say, no, you can't steal my private
[00:02:29] property and sell it for your own profit and gain.
[00:02:33] I mean, Karma got the guy in the end because the guy I think is like fucking homeless and
[00:02:38] living under a bridge somewhere.
[00:02:40] But she went to court at a time when people were calling her the most horrible
[00:02:45] things for having intimate relations with her husband. And how is that anybody's business?
[00:02:53] And you know what? They made him look like a fucking hero, but they made her look to
[00:02:57] be like she was somehow less than a human being. Like it was horrible how she was treated. Anyways, that's that's
[00:03:05] why I say she's got more courage than 10 men because no one had the courage to not only
[00:03:11] go through this humiliation, but then stand up for what is right.
[00:03:17] There is a lot of women that I am extremely thankful on International Women's Day. Pamela
[00:03:22] Anderson didn't make the cut the top 10, but you can tell me more.
[00:03:26] I might bring her up in my top 10 women of all time.
[00:03:29] I have four at home, though, that will automatically rank.
[00:03:33] And you're like, you're in the right place.
[00:03:35] You're in the top 10 right now.
[00:03:36] So let's...
[00:03:37] Oh, gee, thanks.
[00:03:38] You might get displaced by Pamela Anderson,
[00:03:40] depending on how good the story is,
[00:03:42] but I'm excited about International Women's Day,
[00:03:44] but I'm very excited about our little trip to Montreal.
[00:03:48] It should be a great time meeting with Harne Branch and her clients on Monday.
[00:03:52] But Shelley, I am ecstatic to go to Hockey Night in Canada.
[00:03:57] A Montreal Toronto game on a Saturday night.
[00:04:02] I've watched Hockey Night on Saturday for my whole life since I was a baby,
[00:04:09] right? And I have never been there on a Saturday. So I am ecstatic. And I really want to thank the
[00:04:15] team at Harn Branch, who hooking me up with a ticket. Yes, I dare say, there's the biggest smile
[00:04:22] you are ever going to see on Serge's face is going to see his favorite team play on a Saturday night and in Montreal.
[00:04:29] So yes, I know you're going to have such a good time.
[00:04:32] And you will be at all the fancy restaurants and all the fancy shopping because I don't
[00:04:38] know if you've been to Montreal, but the shopping in the restaurants, which are two of your
[00:04:42] favorite things is is on my page.
[00:04:44] So I'm glad you're going early. I'm glad you're going to experience that.
[00:04:48] I will be experienced none of that because I couldn't care less. I'm actually trying to
[00:04:54] get into the Barbie barn. The Barbie barn is a very famous rib place that's been around forever.
[00:05:00] And I last went 25 years ago. And unfortunately, it's closing March 17. So I
[00:05:07] have to experience that one last time. Just coming back to International Women's Day, you and I
[00:05:14] had a plan that we would invite more female executive practitioners in the TA space on the show.
[00:05:22] I made my list of who I would love to have on the show
[00:05:26] and reached out to them,
[00:05:29] explained what the show was about
[00:05:31] and invited them to come on the podcast.
[00:05:34] And Serge, not one, has even gotten back to me.
[00:05:39] Every single one of them has ghosted me.
[00:05:41] I just don't get it, Serge, I just don't get it. Why we can't
[00:05:47] get women to come on the show? Like we have easily reach out to men. They're more than
[00:05:53] happy to come in and talk about talent acquisition and talent attraction and employer brand.
[00:06:00] And like, I am absolutely baffled. Is it me?
[00:06:05] Well, it might be you.
[00:06:07] No, I'm kidding because I've done exactly the same thing.
[00:06:10] We've talked about this and most of the guest booking
[00:06:13] in the past was me and I would reach out
[00:06:16] and I'll tell you the percentage of men saying yes,
[00:06:18] is almost 100%.
[00:06:20] The percentage of women even getting a response
[00:06:23] is generally below 20%.
[00:06:26] We do want to talk to who we feel are thought leaders or doing really great things in talent
[00:06:32] acquisition.
[00:06:33] We need more women.
[00:06:34] We need that perspective because in reality, most people that work in our space, we saw
[00:06:39] it like at the recruiter event a couple of weeks ago, it was 70% women.
[00:06:44] So why are we not getting a representation
[00:06:46] of women on the show? Is it me? Maybe it's me, Shelley. Maybe they're like, oh, there's no way
[00:06:50] I want to talk to that dude. No, no, no. So you know what? I would like to call upon our audience
[00:06:56] and ask, please, if you have a TA leader in your circle, we'd love to have them on the show.
[00:07:05] I know the audience wants to hear about their leadership styles,
[00:07:09] how they organize their team, what are some of the,
[00:07:11] maybe the tech challenges or what they've been able to transform
[00:07:15] as far as their recruitment process or their employer brand.
[00:07:19] So if I'm missing something, help me out here.
[00:07:22] Let's call upon our audience.
[00:07:25] Do an introduction.
[00:07:26] That's all I want.
[00:07:27] Like, we'll be really nice.
[00:07:29] We're really organized too.
[00:07:31] Like, it's not the big stressful thing that people think it is.
[00:07:34] Like, we send out an interview guide in advance.
[00:07:38] But it's no gotcha questions.
[00:07:40] So you can be fully prepared or have your communications team read it,
[00:07:44] like what we're going to ask you.
[00:07:46] So there's very low risk and sharing knowledge is what we're all about.
[00:07:50] Yeah. We want more perspectives.
[00:07:53] And to that point, even if we look at talent acquisition leaders,
[00:07:57] I think that's one where we want to dig in most this year.
[00:08:00] And we got in that feedback in our listener service,
[00:08:03] we did probably a month ago
[00:08:05] that we want more practitioners and talent acquisition leaders on the show. And we're
[00:08:10] definitely wanting to deliver on that. But a big portion of that is being very intentional.
[00:08:16] And we want to bring a lot of women that are leading talent acquisition and also women
[00:08:21] that are leading HR tech firms. If you're interested, let's talk.
[00:08:25] We'd love to have you on.
[00:08:27] So, Shelley, it's time for us to jump into the news.
[00:08:33] And I thought we would focus on things that have gone a little bit viral.
[00:08:37] Have you ever heard of vice.com?
[00:08:39] Is that like a news outlet that you've ever read in the past?
[00:08:42] It was really big, like in the early 2000s to 2010
[00:08:47] maybe and then losses influence over the years. But do you know who they are?
[00:08:53] Well, I do now. I quite honestly like vaguely remember who they are. But yeah, you're right.
[00:08:59] They're not quite the household name that they were in the past.
[00:09:03] not quite the household name that they were in the past.
[00:09:08] Yeah, so they made the news this week and like most news organizations are struggling. They did massive layoffs. That's
[00:09:12] not what caused them to go viral. What caused them to go viral
[00:09:16] is as the chief commercial officer was going through the
[00:09:20] message, first of all, there were so many arms and arms and
[00:09:24] like nervous. I'm like,
[00:09:25] can't you get someone that can deliver this message in a confident way? But aside from the point,
[00:09:30] as they were doing this zoom call, suddenly announcing the layoffs and announcing the changes,
[00:09:36] a bunch of Tomstown emojis came up on the screen. So as this was happening,
[00:09:49] So as this was happening, the CEO Bruce Dixon stopped the meeting saying, hey, I can't ignore these emojis, the negative connotation of what's going on here.
[00:09:53] I think we stopped the meeting and we'll reschedule.
[00:09:56] Basically what he didn't realize, and this is really stupid.
[00:09:59] I'm like, if you don't want to see the emojis, you can turn those off and you can turn off
[00:10:03] any commenting.
[00:10:05] But like, dude, suck it up.
[00:10:07] All of these people are losing their jobs, the announcement,
[00:10:11] and they're just putting a thumbs down emoji.
[00:10:14] So to have the arrogance to come out and be like,
[00:10:17] how disrespectful and everything,
[00:10:19] all is your fault, you dummy?
[00:10:22] What was your whole take on this?
[00:10:24] My take on this, first of all, I'm with you like the chief
[00:10:28] commercial officer. She had clearly not even rehearsed what
[00:10:34] she was going to say. Yeah, it feels so awkward. And I'm
[00:10:38] looking at her and I can feel how disorganized and discombobulated she is.
[00:10:46] Like she's clearly flustered
[00:10:49] and is trying to get this message across
[00:10:52] but I don't believe she rehearsed it.
[00:10:54] It was like, hey, point, shoot, you're on, click go.
[00:10:58] So I felt really bad for her
[00:11:00] and even worse when the CEO jumps in, it cuts her off.
[00:11:05] And you can see them in their conference room.
[00:11:08] It's just, oh my goodness, so badly done.
[00:11:11] What were they thinking?
[00:11:13] Well, you know what?
[00:11:14] First of all, I think she was probably given this
[00:11:16] at the last minute being like,
[00:11:17] oh, you're going to deliver the message
[00:11:19] which just seems wrong in so many ways.
[00:11:22] I don't care what your title is,
[00:11:23] but this is as a leader, the CEO.
[00:11:26] If you're doing something that's going to negatively affect
[00:11:29] a whole lot of people, the message comes from you.
[00:11:32] You don't delegate that stuff at all, in my opinion.
[00:11:36] I don't know if you've noticed this,
[00:11:37] but there is like a tone deafness
[00:11:40] when it comes to executives in this current landscape,
[00:11:42] because I'm still reading a lot of articles.
[00:11:46] And we've seen the stories like in the past three, four months,
[00:11:50] we covered a lot of it of just not being on the same page as the employees.
[00:11:54] First of all, with this vice thing, just let it go.
[00:11:58] Just finish it.
[00:11:59] Like because he stopped it.
[00:12:00] They have to book another call and just disable the emojis.
[00:12:04] You're already 90% done. Just go through it and get it done. Do you think they should have stopped it. They have to book another call and just disable the emojis. You're already 90% done. Just go through it and get it done.
[00:12:08] Do you think they should have stopped it, shall we?
[00:12:10] I don't know. Like in the moment,
[00:12:13] it was probably the right thing to do.
[00:12:14] Not only was she fumbling and stumbling over what to say.
[00:12:19] Yeah.
[00:12:19] People were clearly upset because it was like a nonstop stream
[00:12:24] of thumbs down emojis. I do believe he
[00:12:27] should have stepped in and said something heartfelt. Like I realize this is a highly emotional like
[00:12:34] why did he not have her back rather than interrupt her and stop her it just goes to the core of what
[00:12:41] you were saying of how out of touch executives are because this is
[00:12:46] not affecting them. Yes, they have to deliver the message. That's what you're paid to do.
[00:12:52] But it's not affecting them. They're not losing their job. They're not.
[00:12:56] I think you nailed it when you said this. CEO could have jumped in with a heartfelt message and
[00:13:01] basically, hey, I understand how you guys feeling, but let's be respectful of what's going on.
[00:13:06] Something like that would have been received way more.
[00:13:08] But I do want to go away, I guess, into a more positive move.
[00:13:12] Okay.
[00:13:13] Shelly, we've talked about this and I've showed you my examples of when you're going out and
[00:13:16] looking for a job, right?
[00:13:18] Like I've created a portfolio of the work I've done.
[00:13:21] You can do similar things, right?
[00:13:23] Creating a video. There was this really enterprising young lady,
[00:13:27] Marta Purerto, that showed the example
[00:13:31] of what candidates can do to really stick out.
[00:13:34] Before we get into it, though, Shelley,
[00:13:36] I wanna get your thoughts here because
[00:13:38] one of the things that happens a lot to me is
[00:13:41] I got a lot of people applying for jobs,
[00:13:43] even though I am not even a recruiter, right?
[00:13:46] I'm getting tons of message from people that are like, hey, can you help me get a job?
[00:13:52] When I was a recruiter, nothing frustrated me more. And what was the most annoying thing of it is
[00:13:59] they were never qualified. Like I looked at their profile, I'm like, why the hell are you even reaching out to me? Why are you applying for this job? I see nothing in your history that says that
[00:14:10] you're qualified. Am I the only one that feels like that as a recruiter? Maybe it's unpopular,
[00:14:15] but who is giving people advice to go directly to the recruiters or the hiring managers?
[00:14:21] What you should be doing instead is building a brand ahead of the game and connecting
[00:14:26] with the people. So when you do need to leverage, we have a relationship, but cold emailing for
[00:14:32] applying for jobs. Am I wrong to be pissed off or not pissed off annoyed by it?
[00:14:39] So I think there's two things that we should maybe reflect on. And that is on LinkedIn as a platform.
[00:14:47] Yeah.
[00:14:48] You have the option as a recruiter to show anyone looking at the job who posted the job.
[00:14:56] Yeah.
[00:14:56] So if it says Shelly Billinghurst posted this job, so thereby encouraging people to reach out,
[00:15:02] right? Now that is completely appropriate if you are
[00:15:07] searching for say a vice president of IT. Yeah. If you are trying to find some very,
[00:15:17] very niche narrow skill like a PhD in biology and specifics in cellular breakdown prior to cancer treatment, right?
[00:15:29] Of course, you're going to put your name out there because there's only going to be 10
[00:15:33] people that apply.
[00:15:35] But that's not the case if you are recruiting jobs that would bring you 600 or 700 applicants.
[00:15:42] So we need to dial back and look at like, how did we get here?
[00:15:45] And where did this idea come from that it's somehow good advice to apply for the job on
[00:15:51] the applicant tracking system and then reach out to people directly. So I think your frustration
[00:15:57] is felt by many recruiters. I don't think anybody would disagree that the fact is I've got 350 people to review in the applicant
[00:16:06] tracking system. And then I'm also got to worry about people messaging me directly on LinkedIn.
[00:16:12] So, Shelley, are you saying that we actually review resumes on our applicant tracking system?
[00:16:17] I thought it was a robot. That's the message we're getting as well, right?
[00:16:22] Maybe it's a robot, but I think good recruiters will generally
[00:16:27] use some filters, which is not robots. It's filters. Like there's knockout questions in your
[00:16:33] applicant tracking system, right? Even people that choose not to answer the questions,
[00:16:38] I know recruiters will still generally look at the application, right? So we do have our work cut out for us.
[00:16:46] I think that's part of what has morphed into this.
[00:16:50] And quite honestly, this video that went viral
[00:16:54] from Marta Peruto is the fact that she had
[00:17:00] this light bulb moment that says, wait a minute,
[00:17:04] she noticed as she's applying for jobs, that
[00:17:07] there's 100 other applicants. Okay, so I get the desperation. If you know you're one of
[00:17:13] 300 or one of 700 people, you've got to do something differently. Like you mentioned,
[00:17:20] search as a job seeker getting super creative about how you show up. Sending somebody an
[00:17:28] in mail, it's like the amount of effort you put into something will typically be reciprocated.
[00:17:35] Yes. Sending out 50 in mails. What do you expect for a response? Really? What is your
[00:17:43] expectation?
[00:17:48] That's exactly the question, though, is like, I don't mind if they apply for the job and be like, send me a message, hey,
[00:17:51] heads up, I applied for this job, keep an eye on my resume.
[00:17:53] And that's completely different than, hey, let's meet for coffee
[00:17:56] and talk about the job. I'm looking at your resume, you're
[00:17:58] not qualified. So no, I don't have 15 30 minutes to waste
[00:18:04] talking about this
[00:18:05] unless, and I'm saying this as a corporate recruiter,
[00:18:08] if you're in staffing or anything like that,
[00:18:09] it makes potentially a lot of sense,
[00:18:11] but there's many factors, right?
[00:18:13] Are they qualified?
[00:18:15] Are they in the right location?
[00:18:17] Could they be a potential candidate for other roles?
[00:18:20] Like those are all things that we look at.
[00:18:22] But when you're applying for a job,
[00:18:24] I'll give you this advice.
[00:18:25] If you are qualified, the recruiter will find you.
[00:18:28] I guarantee you that they will find you in those applicants.
[00:18:32] But to your point, you have to stand out.
[00:18:35] So if you are going to reach out to people
[00:18:38] and have a really creative message
[00:18:40] or something that is just so different,
[00:18:43] because this lady, to your point, she really did something
[00:18:47] clever in the way she approached it. She's based in Madrid. She's a product marketing manager
[00:18:53] and she called her video Meet Martha the Movie. A couple of things that she highlighted like she
[00:18:58] speaks fluently in six languages. She talked about commendations from employers,
[00:19:05] culture, how about we just watch it
[00:19:06] actually. I'm going to play it right now.
[00:19:08] Then you can me your impression on it.
[00:19:10] Hi, I'm Marita.
[00:19:12] I recently got data from my job as a product
[00:19:15] marketing manager.
[00:19:19] I was in love with my job doing marketing
[00:19:21] in a company built for freelancers.
[00:19:24] But all of a sudden...
[00:19:30] I did a lot of thinking.
[00:19:33] Traveling.
[00:19:35] And of course, applying.
[00:19:38] I was applying to so many jobs that had hundreds of applicants
[00:19:41] and wasn't even getting an interview.
[00:19:43] All I wanted was to meet face-to-face.
[00:19:47] And then I realized I needed to be marketing a new product.
[00:19:55] There had to be a better way to grab people's attention and stand up from the crowd.
[00:20:01] I hope you've enjoyed the free version of Martha. If you'd like to see more, you'll have to go to the website.
[00:20:10] So Shelley, it's a video, so please everyone go check out the video. But it basically stops
[00:20:14] cold and be like free version ended. If you want to book an interview, click here. Just
[00:20:19] brilliant because literally anyone with an iPhone can create the same quality as she just did.
[00:20:26] Her video did go viral on LinkedIn.
[00:20:28] There was millions of views.
[00:20:30] Exactly.
[00:20:31] And widespread admiration for what she had done.
[00:20:34] Good on her.
[00:20:35] Here's the interesting thing
[00:20:37] when she has the light bulb moment
[00:20:39] is she realizes that what she is great at doing
[00:20:42] is marketing products.
[00:20:44] So she took her skills and expertise
[00:20:47] and made herself the product.
[00:20:49] Like, you really would expect that from a product marketer.
[00:20:53] And I think as recruiters,
[00:20:55] when we find ourselves laid off and looking for work,
[00:20:58] guess what?
[00:20:59] We expect more from you as well.
[00:21:02] You should come with a portfolio.
[00:21:04] You should come with data,
[00:21:05] analytics, testimonials from hiring managers to show up with a resume that is
[00:21:11] just a chronological representation of the companies that you worked for and
[00:21:15] you expect that's going to land you an interview? No. You are held to a higher
[00:21:20] standard. This is a beautiful example. So So well done, Marta. Well done.
[00:21:26] Yes, we are big fans. Shelly, how about we jump into the tip of the week?
[00:21:33] You bet tip of the week is brought to you by Plum. Plum knows that when people flourish,
[00:21:39] businesses thrive. Using science backed insights, Plum aligns human potential with job needs,
[00:21:45] allowing you to build high-performing teams from a single platform.
[00:21:49] Ideal for improving hiring choices, identifying future leaders,
[00:21:53] and offering personalized career advice, Plumb supports the entire employee journey
[00:21:58] from hire to retire. Discover more at plumb.io.
[00:22:03] So my tip of the week this week, Serge, is about being
[00:22:07] resourceful. That is finding ideas from other sources. So I wanted to share this
[00:22:14] with our audience because this subscription is free and we will include
[00:22:19] it in the show notes. You can get your hands on lists of layoffs, as
[00:22:26] well as strict to return to office mandates as a source of
[00:22:31] where to target for potential candidates. What is available
[00:22:35] now is the fact that when organizations are laying off
[00:22:41] more than a certain number of people. And again, I think in Canada, something like more than 10.
[00:22:48] Yeah.
[00:22:49] They must provide a heads up to the government to say,
[00:22:54] how many they're laying off, potentially the reason why,
[00:22:58] and when they plan to do it.
[00:23:01] So some larger organizations are required to give as much as 90 days notice
[00:23:06] if they intend to lay off thousands of people or hundreds of people. So as a recruiter, would you
[00:23:13] not want to have a layoff tracker? It's public information and it's free and certainly no
[00:23:21] employee should be in the dark either about layoffs coming up.
[00:23:25] But as recruiters, here's a resource
[00:23:27] you need to have at your fingertips.
[00:23:30] The other is this tracker also provides those organizations
[00:23:36] that have mandated very strict return to office policies
[00:23:40] such as five day in office mandates
[00:23:42] from the likes of Boeing and UPS, four-day requirements
[00:23:46] from Qualcomm or not allowing Friday's work-from-home days like Deutsche Bank. We know that according to
[00:23:55] all the research that we can get our hands on, Conference Board of Canada is a wonderful resource
[00:23:59] that tells us when workers are asked about what part of their total experience would cause
[00:24:05] them to look for another job.
[00:24:08] We know these mandates of return to office will cause people to start looking.
[00:24:15] Well, Jesus, if you've got a list of who's done this, it's like gold.
[00:24:20] So my tip of the week is this.
[00:24:22] Look in our show notes and you will see a connection
[00:24:25] to a free resource for layoffs and returned office mandates. And so happy recruiting.
[00:24:32] What is it called, Shelley? It is called talentedgeweekly.com.
[00:24:40] Yes. So what's cool about it is actually, you know, before it happens, I've been leveraging
[00:24:47] layoffs.fyi for five years, but that's always after the fact, right? And it's public. So that's
[00:24:54] another resource that you can leverage. But what I like about this, what it's actually before it
[00:24:58] really hits the public. This is a good time to get ahead of other recruiters that are as hungry as you are. So yes,
[00:25:05] good tip. Definitely check that out. And I do like to return to office mandates because that's
[00:25:10] another thing. I'm like, I'm just going to drive to their parking lot at their office and go put
[00:25:16] flyers in all of their windows that, hey, I'm hiring remotely. That would definitely work.
[00:25:22] That would definitely work. Perfect. Now let's jump into our recruitment insights brought to you by our friends at
[00:25:30] Mitova.
[00:25:32] Shelley, are you tired of the same old outsourcing woes?
[00:25:36] Well say hello to near-shoring. It's like outsourcing but closer and it won't make you
[00:25:41] pull your hair out.
[00:25:43] Picture this. Top notch IT talent from Latin American.
[00:25:46] Many Latin American IT professionals
[00:25:49] have strong English language skills
[00:25:51] and even live in the same time zone.
[00:25:53] So no more midnight conference calls.
[00:25:55] Hallelujah.
[00:25:57] Plus, Latin America's growing tech ecosystem,
[00:26:00] strong educational institutions,
[00:26:02] and a pool of skilled IT professionals make
[00:26:05] it the perfect region for recruiting talent.
[00:26:08] I have the perfect company that does this.
[00:26:11] The company's name is Mitova.
[00:26:13] They have local experts who handle everything from recruiting to HR support.
[00:26:18] So why settle for the same old outsourcing blues when you can have the near-shoring party
[00:26:24] with Mitova? same old outsourcing blues when you can have the near-shoring party with
[00:26:25] Mitova.
[00:26:26] Look them up at Mitova.com and let's get the Fiesta started.
[00:26:31] We've got a lot going on this week, so let's breeze through it as quickly as we
[00:26:37] can.
[00:26:38] So I came across an article from an author called Aki Ito and what she did is
[00:26:43] she experimented using bots to apply for jobs.
[00:26:47] And she looked at the, I think the four biggest, so she leveraged Senera, one salting AI, massive
[00:26:56] and lazy apply.
[00:26:57] And her experience was quite different with all of them.
[00:27:00] Let me give you a little bit of a breakdown. So the first one she tried was
[00:27:06] Cenera. So Cenera is $80 a month, which is the most expensive. And it will allow you to apply for
[00:27:13] 420 openings. So basically spent around half an hour is putting your resume completing your profile.
[00:27:21] And then Cenera came up with maybe a dozen jobs. As she was going through
[00:27:26] it, she got a message the next week being like, oh, by the way, the service is shutting down, so
[00:27:32] per $80 is down the tube, doesn't work. So now she went to one salting and this one was a lot
[00:27:38] cheaper, it's $20 in mine, but it ended up being pretty glitchy and didn't exactly work the way she
[00:27:46] wanted.
[00:27:47] So now she tried lazy apply.
[00:27:50] So they didn't have a monthly subscription offer.
[00:27:52] They had you had to purchase a lifetime plan of $129.
[00:27:57] So the 129 gave you the ability to submit to a maximum of 750 applications per day.
[00:28:05] Now you can actually get a more expensive plan
[00:28:07] that you can apply to more job.
[00:28:10] Unlike the other bots, Lazy apply
[00:28:13] in just jobs from all the external job boards.
[00:28:16] So LinkedIn, Indeed, it recruiters,
[00:28:19] she had to tie her profile to it
[00:28:21] and then she just said it loose.
[00:28:24] What was different about this one?
[00:28:25] Alazy applied to all the applying in real time.
[00:28:28] It's basically a bot that's applying.
[00:28:30] It feels like someone just like is taking over
[00:28:33] your computer is applying to all of these jobs.
[00:28:36] It's a couple of the things that happened.
[00:28:38] So we've talked about AI hallucinating a little bit
[00:28:41] and just making up things.
[00:28:42] Well, I guess what it did.
[00:28:44] So in one application, the bot indicated that I speak
[00:28:48] conversational level Spanish, which she definitely does not.
[00:28:52] And another, it reported that I was an African American,
[00:28:57] even though I had specified my lazy apply profile that I am Asian.
[00:29:02] And as she's going through it, some of the things really started being not right.
[00:29:07] She noticed that Lazy Apply wasn't using the updated resume I had given. Instead, it was attaching
[00:29:13] a document I didn't recognize title. Aki Ito, cover letter resume, links were insider.pdf.
[00:29:20] That's strange, I thought. And then when she opened the PDF, it was dated October 24, 2020,
[00:29:27] and it read, Dear Mr. Carlson,
[00:29:29] I'm writing to apply for the Analytical Features Edition position at Insider.
[00:29:34] Instead of sending out the updated resume I provided,
[00:29:37] Lazy Apply was submitting an all-covered letter it had found buried
[00:29:42] in the depths of my LinkedIn account from when I had applied to
[00:29:46] Business Insider three years ago. So in a single-spirt 27 employers ranging from a website that I never
[00:29:54] heard of and then the Boston Globe received an application from me that I talked about how much
[00:29:59] I wanted to work for one of their competitors. Lazy Apply was living up to his name.
[00:30:06] Couple of interesting thing as we dig in deeper,
[00:30:09] she got a 6% response rate on these jobs.
[00:30:13] That of these thousands applicants,
[00:30:15] she probably got like 60 callbacks,
[00:30:17] but the harm has been done, in my opinion.
[00:30:21] It shows that, yeah, 27 companies got a cover letter of you applying
[00:30:28] to another job. Like, how good is that for your brand?
[00:30:31] Shelley, what's your whole take here? Yeah. So when I saw this as well, I was like, as
[00:30:40] a recruiter, I can tell you back in the day, when cover letters were maybe a thing,
[00:30:46] they're coming back in style because now they're easy to do with chat, Chippity.
[00:30:51] I can't begin to tell you like nine times out of 10, I may be exaggerating a little.
[00:30:56] The candidate forgot to change the address and name of the company in the cover letter,
[00:31:01] which is very damaging.
[00:31:03] Like really, if you can't get the name right, attention to detail is not your thing. And it is a lather rinse repeat
[00:31:11] exercise if you want to cover letter. I'm only going to write one and send it out with
[00:31:14] all of them. What really scared me was the fact that it went into her history and her
[00:31:22] back catalog for lack of a better word, but it was like it took over her
[00:31:27] computer and just started sending them out. I don't know in what world sending out 750 applications
[00:31:36] is manageable for anyone. No, it's not. So 6% getting callbacks, that is really good.
[00:31:45] So 6% getting callbacks, that is really good.
[00:31:48] When you consider you're just randomly applying. The fact is though, you get back what you put out.
[00:31:53] I agree and I think going back to example of Marta
[00:31:57] that we just talked about is she's very targeted,
[00:32:00] decided to create a strategy to make her a preferred candidate
[00:32:04] and it works.
[00:32:05] The spamming of jobs is not helping anyone.
[00:32:09] It's actually affecting the market dramatically.
[00:32:12] It is creating so much noise that recruiters who are understaffed right now
[00:32:17] are getting 1000 of applicants.
[00:32:19] And what's real?
[00:32:19] What's not like, how can you even be qualified for 750 jobs in your local market or even remotely?
[00:32:29] I don't even know how that is possible.
[00:32:32] Like if I go on LinkedIn right now,
[00:32:34] or indeed, and I type in our local,
[00:32:37] there's maybe 10 jobs that I'm fully qualified
[00:32:40] and I should apply for.
[00:32:42] How am I applying to 750 jobs?
[00:32:44] Just seems ridiculous.
[00:32:46] And it's going to get worse, Shelley.
[00:32:49] We are very close to robots interviewing robots.
[00:32:52] And I think this will help drive it.
[00:32:54] But on that note, digging into a candid experience even more, I want to talk about
[00:33:00] rejection emails and you can cross something that was really interesting.
[00:33:04] So once again, I'm a fan of some of the big five accounting firms. about rejection emails and you came across something that was really interesting.
[00:33:05] So once again, I'm a fan of some of the big five accounting firms.
[00:33:10] Ernst & Young apparently remembers me.
[00:33:14] I was test driving a few years ago with their application process just as part of our research for the show.
[00:33:20] But it remembered me because it sent me a rejection email that was really interesting.
[00:33:28] And it made me think of a few things.
[00:33:29] First of all, it said, Hi, Shelley wanted to follow up on my last emails about applying
[00:33:35] to Ernst & Young and keeping your CV specific to those applications.
[00:33:40] So it's a rejection email, but they go on to explain about why the application was rejected.
[00:33:49] And I think what I use to apply, as I usually do when I'm test driving, is I have an award-winning
[00:33:56] chili recipe, and I upload that rather than my resume.
[00:34:00] Interesting.
[00:34:01] To see how it handles that. And not that they looked at my chili recipe or not, but at any rate, it made me think about
[00:34:10] the fact that they crafted a response that said, your resume was nowhere close without
[00:34:17] coming right out and saying that you're completely unqualified.
[00:34:21] Well, I sent them a chili recipe.
[00:34:23] So it's got some intelligence
[00:34:26] here. But what was interesting was it gave me coaching tips about why my application was rejected.
[00:34:34] It said, read the email we just sent you very carefully because we will always advise you on
[00:34:39] the reasons why you've not been successful. Secondly, think about what you applied for. And this is all in a single email.
[00:34:46] It's EY branded, it's lovely.
[00:34:49] Then recommending that I review my resume.
[00:34:53] Like it says, we're not expecting you
[00:34:56] to rewrite your resume for every application,
[00:34:59] but maybe have a few people take a look at it for you
[00:35:01] and give you some feedback.
[00:35:03] And then lastly, don't be put off by this. Just because it's no for now, it does not mean no forever. A really
[00:35:10] nice message from Ernst & Young, but it also made me think, first of all, they understand
[00:35:19] that they have a pool of people that know their brand. They have a pool of people that took the time
[00:35:25] to fill in their application.
[00:35:27] And it's got to be two years ago,
[00:35:30] Serge, that I put in any sort of application
[00:35:34] or test drove their application process.
[00:35:36] And yet I stay in their system, right?
[00:35:40] So it just made me think they must be utilizing
[00:35:44] some technology.
[00:35:45] And I think as TA leaders, we have this opportunity.
[00:35:48] When recruiters are rejecting resumes or the systems rejecting it
[00:35:52] or the robots rejecting it, whatever, there's always a reason.
[00:35:56] Right? And the reason code could be this person is no indication
[00:36:02] of legally able to work in the country.
[00:36:04] And it says right through the application process,
[00:36:06] we need to know if you have a work permit.
[00:36:09] So that would garner a disposition reason code
[00:36:13] or disposition reason code
[00:36:15] is it doesn't meet minimum qualifications.
[00:36:18] So this is all data that you as a TA leader can look at
[00:36:22] and say, we've got a trend happening here.
[00:36:25] And part of that trend could be that we're attracting people
[00:36:29] that have no previous experience in accounting, for example.
[00:36:35] And so then it becomes the roadmap for what TA needs to do.
[00:36:40] TA needs to understand we need to change our messaging if we've got hundreds of applicants
[00:36:47] applying to us from certain countries.
[00:36:50] There must be a perception in that country that we will sponsor work permits.
[00:36:55] Hey, you know what?
[00:36:57] Now you know what to do, right?
[00:36:58] But all of this is really juicy data about how to improve your candidate experience. That was a long-winded
[00:37:07] answer to your question.
[00:37:09] I know I love it and you know when you sent that article it really hit me because I had
[00:37:13] just read Bradley Clark, friend of the show, and her a reg test, Rott Tex, and also the
[00:37:21] talent acquisition lead at article, the furniture company base in Vancouver.
[00:37:26] And credit to Bradley because he's been really working hard and creating a standard for how his
[00:37:34] recruiters reject candidates. And there's a couple of things that came out that I thought
[00:37:38] was really interesting. So his goal is, when sure applicants don't go into a black hole,
[00:37:44] we've had times in our talent acquisition departments that candidates have gone into
[00:37:48] black holes.
[00:37:49] Either with the transition of ATS or recruiter leaving, there's something that's happened,
[00:37:54] and you get to put the steps in place to make sure that no candidate goes into a black hole.
[00:37:59] A lot of times it takes a long time, and really what he's put in place is a way to get to
[00:38:04] message really quickly out to candidates so they know where they stand and to your point
[00:38:09] last week, no is an answer, right?
[00:38:12] I think that's what he's trying to do.
[00:38:14] There's one thing that he called out that I think is really interesting.
[00:38:17] So in his post, he said, we've recently seen a trend of non-local candidates applying.
[00:38:22] Yes, there is a possibility for non-local applicants
[00:38:25] to be hired. However, for this to happen, they would need to be better than local candidates.
[00:38:30] Hiring locally is faster for them to start easier to interview and less risky for business.
[00:38:36] I get it. Of course, you want to hire people that are close to your office in the same city
[00:38:42] or where the case is. You crafted a really good message to people
[00:38:46] that are non-local.
[00:38:47] What I found interesting is reading the comments
[00:38:50] on his post.
[00:38:52] Some of it, I'm like,
[00:38:53] tell me that you've never recruited when you post this.
[00:38:56] So whether the comments is,
[00:38:58] can I ask what value rejecting a candidate based on locale
[00:39:02] brings in why mentioned rejection email.
[00:39:07] Why not mention it, right? If you're going to hire locally, it makes a lot of sense.
[00:39:10] Then there's another one that just drove me insane.
[00:39:13] It's screaming bias.
[00:39:16] How is this creating any bias?
[00:39:18] If you're a recruiter and getting hundreds of non qualified
[00:39:23] applicants from all different parts of the world.
[00:39:26] And your job is try to fill the job as quickly as possible.
[00:39:30] Guess what? There's nothing wrong with filtering those candidates out.
[00:39:35] He does clearly state like if there is not a better local candidate, yeah, they're going to go through the steps.
[00:39:40] But we have all seen what those steps are. They take a
[00:39:45] long time. As we mentioned before, notice periods in different countries can be two months,
[00:39:51] can be three months, can be six months. You have to move to come to this location. Like
[00:39:57] it doesn't make any sense. So saying it's bias saying that is just complete bullshit.
[00:40:02] That might be bias on my end, but I'm with Bradley.
[00:40:05] Hire local if you can, if you can't, then you do what you got to do.
[00:40:10] I think your point is well taken surge because this is, tell me you've never recruited without
[00:40:16] telling me you've never recruited. You would never say that. I think my first year of being a recruiter
[00:40:22] is when you are looking, you need to look at who's within
[00:40:27] your local market first. In fact, why wouldn't you? Because once you expand it, I think an
[00:40:34] ethical employer needs to consider relocation. So even if you look at the ground rules of posting on Indeed, if you are going to specifically
[00:40:46] advertise a job, say province-wide, or advertise a job where it's not driving distance, you
[00:40:55] must indicate on your job posting that relocation is provided or something to indicate that
[00:41:02] relocation allowance is considered.
[00:41:05] But you can't just simply splatter advertising this job across Canada and
[00:41:11] not have any sort of expectation.
[00:41:14] In fact, it's our responsibility as recruiters.
[00:41:17] You should not even be entertaining anyone until you've exhausted your local
[00:41:22] market.
[00:41:23] I would also point to our federal government mandates this.
[00:41:28] If you're going to consider somebody from out of Canada,
[00:41:32] you need to first of all demonstrate
[00:41:34] in a very long complicated process
[00:41:38] called the labor market impact assessment.
[00:41:41] You need to undertake and you need to prove
[00:41:43] to the federal government that
[00:41:45] there is nobody here locally that is qualified.
[00:41:48] Yeah.
[00:41:49] It's you're right.
[00:41:50] My hair was on fire as well when I'm reading this and I'm thinking, do you just come
[00:41:53] in office stupid?
[00:41:54] Like you really are like you're coming across as obviously never had to work in recruitment.
[00:42:00] Like maybe was it his choice of words, local or non low?
[00:42:04] No, I don't think any of this is biased or offensive.
[00:42:07] In fact, it's just the opposite.
[00:42:10] It's just the opposite.
[00:42:11] We're treating these candidates with respect
[00:42:15] in dignity and being like,
[00:42:16] this is exactly why we're not moving you forward.
[00:42:20] If the case is that the person is moving to the country
[00:42:24] on that day and is specified that, well, that's a different story because you are 100% right.
[00:42:28] Anyone that's listening that has done the labor market impact assessment process will tell you you do those when you really need to do those.
[00:42:38] I think there's exception, right?
[00:42:39] If you're hiring software developers or things that you're going to hire remotely. That's a different job, right?
[00:42:45] That's a different situation.
[00:42:48] If you're hiring people to come in the office, you got to cover your ass.
[00:42:50] So that's my take on it.
[00:42:52] Shelly, another fantastic episode next week.
[00:42:57] We will be back.
[00:42:58] We'll be back from Montreal and I'll have all the highlights of the Montreal
[00:43:02] Toronto game.
[00:43:03] And you can tell me about your fantastic dinner with
[00:43:07] very handsome rich French men that you're going to find in a store while you're shopping.
[00:43:13] That's wishful thinking but thank you for putting that out to the universe, Serge.
[00:43:17] I appreciate that it comes from your heart that you would just see me enjoying a lovely dinner with
[00:43:23] your heart that you would just see me enjoying a lovely dinner with the
[00:43:29] lovely join us at the Barbie barn and getting some wings and ribs if you're cool with that.
[00:43:30] Yeah, you guys go ahead.
[00:43:32] You guys go ahead.
[00:43:33] All right, Shelley, thank you everyone for listening.
[00:43:36] Merci.
[00:43:38] Or why do you love news about LinkedIn, indeed, Google and just about every other
[00:43:44] recruitment tech company out there.
[00:43:45] Hell yeah, I'm Chad. I'm cheese. We're the Chad and Cheese Podcast. All the latest recruiting news and
[00:43:52] insights are on our show. Dripping in snark and attitude. Subscribe today wherever you listen to
[00:43:59] your podcasts. We out.


