"Imaginary"
Next Best Picture PodcastMarch 09, 202400:52:23

"Imaginary"

For this week's main podcast review, I am joined by Ema SasicJosh ParhamDanilo Castro & Cody Dericks. Today, we are reviewing the latest film from Jeff Wadlow, "Imaginary," starring DeWanda Wise, Tom Payne, Taegen Burns, Pyper Braun, Veronica Falcon & Betty Buckley. It is another Blumhouse horror film with a tiny budget and a creative premise that holds such promise. Imagine what could possibly go wrong, and it does in this disappointing movie. Join us as we discuss the tone, scares, screenplay, and moments of intentional or unintentional laughter in our SPOILER-FILLED review. Thank you for listening, as always. We hope you enjoy it!


Check out more on NextBestPicture.com


Please subscribe on...

SoundCloud - https://soundcloud.com/nextbestpicturepodcast

Apple Podcasts - https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/negs-best-film-podcast/id1087678387?mt=2

Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/7IMIzpYehTqeUa1d9EC4jT

YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWA7KiotcWmHiYYy6wJqwOw

And be sure to help support us on Patreon for as little as $1 a month at https://www.patreon.com/NextBestPicture

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

[00:00:00] Hello, it is Ryan and I was on a flight the other day playing one of my favorite social spin-slot games on chamba casino.com I looked over the person sitting next to me,

[00:00:08] but you know what they were doing? They were also playing Chamba Casino.

[00:00:11] Go incidents? I think not. Everybody's loving having fun with it.

[00:00:13] Chamba Casino's home to hundreds of casino-style games that you can play for free anytime anywhere even at 30,000 feet.

[00:00:20] So sign up now at chambacasino.com to claim your free welcome bonus.

[00:00:24] At chambacasino.com and live the Chamba Life.

[00:00:27] No purchase necessary, D.W. Revoid for him to buy lost C-Terms in conditions 18 plus.

[00:00:30] You were listening to the Next Best Picture Podcast and this is our review of imaginary.

[00:00:36] How does it feel being back?

[00:00:38] Good. I had such good memories here. Maybe my happy place can be our happy place.

[00:00:43] We left you alone alone down here.

[00:00:46] It was just my mind.

[00:00:48] I'm playing a new game with Chonzie.

[00:00:51] The scavenger hunt was that's fun.

[00:00:53] Chonzie says you're not allowed to play with us.

[00:00:56] Oh. Because you left him.

[00:00:58] I mean something happy.

[00:01:00] Something happy.

[00:01:02] Ugh, that bugs treat you out.

[00:01:05] If I can finish my list, Chonzie will take me on a trip to the place he's from.

[00:01:15] Something that hurts.

[00:01:17] Oh, it's...

[00:01:19] All right, everybody. You just listening to the trailer for imaginary and the story is as follows.

[00:01:26] When Jessica moves back into her childhood home with her family,

[00:01:29] her youngest stepdaughter Alice develops an eerie attachment to a stuffed bear named Chonzie.

[00:01:34] She finds in the basement.

[00:01:36] Alice starts playing games with Chonzie that begin playful and become increasingly sinister.

[00:01:42] As Alice's behavior becomes more and more concerning,

[00:01:45] Jessica intervenes only to realize Chonzie is much more than the stuffed toy bear she believed him to be.

[00:01:53] The film is starring D1DWYZ, Tom Payne, Tegan Burns, Piper Braun, Veronica Falcon,

[00:02:01] and Betty Buckley.

[00:02:02] It is directed and written by Jeff Wadlow and co-written by Greg Urban and Jason Ormland.

[00:02:09] Here to join me today for this podcast review I have at Assasic.

[00:02:13] Hello.

[00:02:14] Danilo Castro.

[00:02:16] Everybody. Cody Derrick's.

[00:02:19] Imagine there's no Chonzie.

[00:02:23] And Josh Paarum.

[00:02:25] Hello, hello.

[00:02:26] All right, so I guess we'll go around the horn first and we will ask everyone

[00:02:30] who is your imaginary friend growing up starting with Emma?

[00:02:34] Well, that's great. It's a really nice therapy session that we're about to enter into.

[00:02:38] Because none of them are going to be as fucked up as this.

[00:02:41] Yes, I don't think I really had an imaginary friend.

[00:02:45] I had all of my barbies and so I would play with them.

[00:02:49] But every toy that I had was more physical, like an actual physical being.

[00:02:53] So I don't recall there being a little Chonzie telling me to stab myself with scissors

[00:02:59] or to co-light something on fire, thankfully.

[00:03:03] Danilo, what about you?

[00:03:05] No imaginary friends.

[00:03:06] I did have a teddy bear named Max.

[00:03:09] But he kind of like him, he didn't really prompt me to do anything like criminal.

[00:03:13] So it's less exciting than this.

[00:03:15] Why Max?

[00:03:16] I don't know. That's a good question.

[00:03:18] I think I just decided on Max.

[00:03:19] I was like, this bear seems like a Max.

[00:03:21] All right, Josh, what about you?

[00:03:23] Yeah, and a similar boat.

[00:03:24] I don't know if I had like an actual imaginary friend,

[00:03:27] but I do have a very distinct memory of

[00:03:30] a little jafar from a Latin toy that I would obsessively play with

[00:03:34] and act out scenes of the movie.

[00:03:36] So I had a very strong kinship to that character.

[00:03:38] No.

[00:03:39] That's exactly how Josh, yeah, I know.

[00:03:43] Cody?

[00:03:44] So maybe unsurprising to anybody who's ever spoken to me,

[00:03:46] but I was a very percusious, aware child.

[00:03:49] And so I didn't have an imaginary friend because I felt it was childish

[00:03:52] and unrealistic, which is hilarious when you're five years old.

[00:03:55] But that's me.

[00:03:57] Cody was 35 years old when he was five years old.

[00:04:01] Actually, I mean, I was a very well-served boy's child.

[00:04:04] If anybody has ever seen that as a male sketch,

[00:04:06] it's for a lot about me.

[00:04:08] I had a vintage gunned bear that I called

[00:04:16] gunned because of the tag.

[00:04:19] And we would vanquish enemies together and he was the most badass teddy bear

[00:04:25] you could possibly imagine.

[00:04:27] So in the lead up here to talking about imaginary

[00:04:32] uh, yeah.

[00:04:33] As Emma said, none of these imaginary friends manifested themselves into evil nightmarish

[00:04:41] beings that would tell us to hurt ourselves or hurt others.

[00:04:44] And that's essentially what the concept of imaginary is presenting here is,

[00:04:48] oh, what if the imaginary friend that you had was something or someone that was trying to do

[00:04:54] you or people you loved harm?

[00:04:56] And of course, it's a little bit more than that as we get into the characters and their backstory.

[00:05:03] And guys, I gotta be honest with you, like I'm trying to make this sound somewhat professional,

[00:05:08] but in all honesty, this is not a good movie.

[00:05:12] This is a pretty, pretty poor horror film from Blum House.

[00:05:16] So going around the horn once again, what did you all think of imaginary?

[00:05:21] I will start us off with Cody Derrick's.

[00:05:23] Cody, you wrote the review on the website.

[00:05:25] And you're our horror expert.

[00:05:28] Did this do anything for you?

[00:05:31] It did things for me, but not what the film probably intended.

[00:05:35] So, you know, I have a lot of admiration for Blum House, especially their business model,

[00:05:39] which allows smaller, low-budget horror films from

[00:05:43] usually newer directors to get released under their umbrella and inevitably see a significant profit.

[00:05:48] I really appreciate that.

[00:05:50] But imaginary represents a lot of the studio's worst tendencies.

[00:05:54] It's a PG-13 film that's pretty toothless,

[00:05:57] birthed from a truly confounding, often contradictory screenplay.

[00:06:01] I'm sure we'll get into some of the things this screenplay backs.

[00:06:06] It really conjures up a lot.

[00:06:07] It's very confusing and odd at times and not intentionally.

[00:06:11] And PG-13 horror movies have the capacity to be good and even scary.

[00:06:15] I'm thinking of something as foundational to me as a horror addict

[00:06:19] as the English remake of The Ring or even something as terrifying as the upcoming

[00:06:24] I Saw The TV Glow, which is PG-13 kind of surprisingly.

[00:06:27] But features some of the most unsettling moments I can see in recent memory.

[00:06:31] But imaginary is just sloppily made and just really not very scary outside of a small handful

[00:06:38] of Starling images and just okay jump scares.

[00:06:42] All right. I'm a sassy. What about you?

[00:06:44] What did you think? Well, I think it's really funny that in 2024 we are getting two vastly

[00:06:50] different films about imaginary friends. One is this the other one is if by John Kuzinski.

[00:06:56] No joke. I legitimately thought they were to say movie for a while.

[00:06:59] Me too. Me too.

[00:07:00] I'm confused in terms of like I don't know which one I'm about to go into so let's see.

[00:07:08] Yeah, this film, I mean from the Gico, like how it starts off, I was so underwhelmed

[00:07:13] in terms of what should be like a high pace, high stress environment.

[00:07:19] And just the entire time I just found myself sying and like feeling so exhausted watching

[00:07:26] this family navigate one family relationship issues and so many different little bits of drama

[00:07:33] amongst themselves all for it to culminate into this imaginary bear stuffed animal blur.

[00:07:42] And it was just just so much going on and a lot of it felt very mismatched slash nobody really

[00:07:51] wanted to be there. You could just tell the people were phoning it in for this film as usual.

[00:07:57] We've got some weird annoying kids in a film like this which doesn't necessarily always help

[00:08:04] some moments were fine, but yeah, it was just the most.

[00:08:08] All right, let's get through it film in recent memory.

[00:08:12] Yeah, yeah, I definitely feel that Danilo, what about you? Same thoughts?

[00:08:17] Yeah, I'm echoing a lot of what's been said here already. It's it's uh

[00:08:22] it has a decent enough premise and you know this can definitely be executed in a way that's

[00:08:26] entertaining or ridiculous to the point of being like unexpected but they do kind of take the

[00:08:33] most generic streamlined sort of uninspired approach that they can to the material.

[00:08:40] I was reminded like repeatedly throughout the movie like any sort of direction that the story

[00:08:45] took. It was like oh it's like this film only sort of an inferior version or oh now they're

[00:08:49] trying to pull from this film only and it's you know, it's an inferior version so

[00:08:54] I've no problem with genre movies especially pulling from you know other sources as sort of

[00:09:01] a jumping off point but when it's just consistently done to a worst degree it does sort of add up

[00:09:08] but the time I got to the end of this movie is like okay I mean what are we what are we doing here

[00:09:12] you know yeah it's just they they they could have just uh just done something a lot more

[00:09:17] exciting what they did. I don't mean to reiterate already but we'll get into some of the more

[00:09:21] specifics I'm sure as we as we go on here this is uh this is a miss. All right and Josh Parm.

[00:09:27] Yeah, a lot of this movie just feels so like perfunctory to me it just is the minimal amount

[00:09:34] of effort for this kind of a story and this kind of a movie and it doesn't really do anything

[00:09:41] that I found to be very inventive in its storytelling or or in its execution. It just felt like

[00:09:47] the type of movie you would expect this to be coming out around the time that it is. It's like yeah

[00:09:52] this is what I kind of imagined it being and honestly it doesn't make it like an all-out terrible

[00:09:59] film it's not like I would say this is one of the worst movies I've ever seen but it does make it

[00:10:03] really really uninspired. It it takes routes that you have seen in many horror movies with this sort

[00:10:10] of similar premise before and even when it has the opportunity to be a little bit more creative

[00:10:15] especially towards the end and kind of the environment that it's in I found even that section to be

[00:10:22] very underwhelming in terms of its design and its own you know imagination if you were to say so

[00:10:30] yeah it's a very uninspired movie I don't really feel like it does anything that really elicits

[00:10:36] a strong emotion honestly either one way or another it's just so bland and generic that

[00:10:43] even the few occasions where it kind of wants to do something more interesting it kind of fumbles

[00:10:47] the ball at that so it's it's pretty forgettable and not really all that engaging to watch either.

[00:10:55] I should have known when I saw that this was being directed by Jeff Wadlow but I was in for

[00:11:02] well let's just say I was in for it because I have not really enjoyed his previous work

[00:11:09] prior to this and so I didn't really have the highest of expectations on top of that I remember

[00:11:15] watching the trailer and I remember that it had this one really good jump scare which involved a

[00:11:22] hallway and the bear basically morphing into like a more nightmarish version of what you would

[00:11:28] expect to see in a movie like this watching the movie itself though is an exercise in how far

[00:11:36] can we push Matt to the point that he might want to walk out of this movie because for the love

[00:11:42] of God I feel like this film was just constantly teasing and teasing and teasing without actually

[00:11:51] doing anything and then by the time it actually did do something where we got to that scene in

[00:11:55] the trailer that I described it was so underwhelming I completely agree with that sentiment it was so

[00:12:02] so so underwhelming I was never once well actually no that's a lie I would argue that maybe one

[00:12:08] or two jump scares got me pretty good but one thing I keep coming back to is I didn't know exactly

[00:12:14] what this film wanted to be in terms of its identity does it want to be a camp fun horror movie the

[00:12:22] way that Megan presented itself does it want to be genuinely terrifying is it trying to actually

[00:12:29] elicit some form of laughter from how terribly atrocious the dialogue is in this screenplay

[00:12:36] I just couldn't tell what the actual intent was here and that drove me crazy and I kept

[00:12:44] totally out hope that it was gonna get better it was going to get more bonkers or it was going

[00:12:48] to get scarier oh my god I felt like the ending of this movie was just disappointing and I'm happy

[00:12:58] to get into specifics spoilers be damned because I really don't want to dance around why I thought

[00:13:07] that the ending was so underwhelming but overall this movie is something that I just feel

[00:13:15] squandered a tremendous amount of potential with its premise and you know that goes back to what we

[00:13:20] were saying before about like our own imaginary friends in life if you take that childhood idea

[00:13:27] and you turn it into something that could fit into a horror movie I actually do think that the idea

[00:13:31] itself is pretty good like as an elevator pitch for a movie to make on a low budget it's not a

[00:13:38] bad idea it was just the execution I thought was very very very off this even needed to be a hard

[00:13:47] r on the level of something like it or it needed to be something way more fun and not so serious

[00:13:57] like Megan with lucky landslots you can get lucky just about anywhere

[00:14:02] dearly beloved we are gathered here today has anyone seen the bride and groom

[00:14:06] sorry sorry we're here we were getting lucky in the limo when we lost track of time

[00:14:11] no lucky lane casino with cash prices that add up quicker than a guest registry

[00:14:16] in that case I pronounce you lucky

[00:14:19] play for free at lucky landslots dot com daily bonuses are waiting no purchase necessary

[00:14:24] void were prohibited by law 18 plus terms and conditions apply see website for details

[00:14:29] right and when it gets to where it's going it kind of feels like it might be leaning towards a

[00:14:34] perspective that your point is more fun or outrageous but it hasn't done the work to get to

[00:14:40] that point yet and you know I look at this it has three as three writers on the screen play

[00:14:45] the movie as a whole kind of felt like and I don't usually say this as a critique because

[00:14:49] I don't really hold this against movies very much but it felt very chopped up in like the editing

[00:14:54] bay like there was a lot of nonsensical match cuts and again contradictory images and even lines

[00:15:02] of dialogue that made me think this movie just felt very unpolished and speaking to those last

[00:15:08] like 10 minutes Matt like you said I even like I fell for the twist like this not twist for the trick

[00:15:16] of the fake out ending and I just fully rolled up my seats my recliner theater scene was ready to

[00:15:21] bolt out there and then there was another like 10 minutes and it was just really unnecessary and

[00:15:26] not shocking just kind of deflating at that point. The ending to this movie yeah when

[00:15:33] you get to that part especially it you already feel like something's about to happen and not

[00:15:38] really because you are expecting it I think it's more so just because it's so horribly shot

[00:15:45] and executed that you just feel like something is off just because of that and I think that is

[00:15:51] very indicative of a lot of the decisions that go on in this movie that it it just feels as you

[00:15:57] said yeah so unpolished it feels like they took the first draft of this screen playing just that

[00:16:01] that's good we'll run with that and and the creativity stopped there yeah when everything like

[00:16:08] quote unquote changes when you're like oh psych it was the most lazyist's psych out moment

[00:16:16] and I truly was like you know what we were really close to ending this you could have just

[00:16:22] ended it it did not need to be at all like this yeah I was really really hoping that we were

[00:16:29] going to get like a clue like ending like I was like give me multiple fake out endings please

[00:16:35] just like toy around with me have fun because by that point the movie I was just begging it to do

[00:16:41] something instead of making me feel like oh my god get me out of here I want to go home yeah it's

[00:16:46] to that point about like you sort of compared it to sort of a Megan in like a different tonality

[00:16:51] kind of sense it's like if it had leaned into sort of a more absurd thing you could have

[00:16:57] you could have gone similar directions and made it entertain but they take it so serious in such a

[00:17:02] such a joyless way that it's like come on are you really you're really trying to go here you know

[00:17:07] like you just you don't want to give it the benefit of it doubt because it's so uninspired in that way

[00:17:11] they really really really thought they were saying something when they were including references to

[00:17:15] Bing Bong from inside out in this screenplay and all they were doing instead was making me go

[00:17:21] fuck I want to go watch that instead I'd rather watch that yeah why do they have to mention

[00:17:27] they kept mentioning that at least 10 times in this film and I was like okay we got the rights

[00:17:33] from Pixar I guess to save this I didn't even know Bing Bong had that much of a cultural impact

[00:17:38] that it could make its way into a movie like this to be fair I do constantly think about Bing Bong

[00:17:45] and how that scene wrecked me a few years ago and I recently rewatched it so I will give them

[00:17:50] that my thinking with all the Bing Bong nonsense which really does get like yeah three or four

[00:17:57] call outs across this movie which is odd and with different tones every time it's always like funny

[00:18:03] is that it points to who this movie is aiming towards because you got a figure that movie is

[00:18:07] almost 10 years old this is a PG 13 horror movie a lot of kids probably grew up with that movie

[00:18:12] as a point of reference and now to watch this horror movie if they're old enough to do so that's

[00:18:17] a good way for them to know what the film is talking about but totally it's just ridiculous and

[00:18:23] points to kind of like the perspective of the screenplay being a skew the entire time I mean this movie

[00:18:28] ultimately wants to also be a story about a woman Jessica here played by Dewanda Wise who

[00:18:36] it like is struggling to be this stepmother and is reconciling her own childhood trauma and at a

[00:18:45] certain point I was like you know I get that horror has to have these underlying meanings to them

[00:18:52] but you guys are laying it on way too thick and heavy and you just haven't earned the right

[00:18:57] to give me a meaningful story that's worth caring about when everything else surrounding it is not

[00:19:01] as effective as it should be and I just wish you could have not taken itself so seriously

[00:19:07] and really just revel in the bonkers nature of the promise that the

[00:19:14] conceited this movie held because I really do think that this type of premise lends itself well

[00:19:20] to creativity and you know no pun intended imagination and that wasn't on display here instead

[00:19:27] what we got were CGI shots of Ted

[00:19:35] I just kept thinking this is like if Ted just like started murdering people

[00:19:40] yeah I would have like because you I guess when you are a kid and your imagination runs wild

[00:19:46] like I would have loved to have seen I don't know this bear like shapeshift into like so many

[00:19:51] different little terrifying creatures or like you know like people thinking that they're seeing

[00:19:58] you know a bunch of crazy stuff all around them and it's it's usually just in the form of this bear

[00:20:04] which yes the bear the bear's eyes are a bit unsettling in this but I can't say that he's like

[00:20:11] the most terrifying looking like doll that a child would play with I had some very creepy

[00:20:18] little porcelain dolls at home so they beat this thing and yeah like you don't see them like

[00:20:25] utilizing the physics of imagination until all the way at the end when they're like doing

[00:20:32] the door thing because I was like yeah why was this missing throughout this entire film like

[00:20:38] obviously you can do that in this in this this is a one instance where you can do stupid things

[00:20:44] like this why are we not utilizing this more right they like some of me when I said like they tease

[00:20:49] and waited too long to reveal it that by the time they did it's like you've already lost me like

[00:20:53] if you would have revealed this earlier in the movie and had it shapeshift like kind of like

[00:20:58] I was saying like it you know that's something that I think could have been so much more effective

[00:21:02] it probably would have gotten called out for being this is this is not as good as that but at the same

[00:21:07] time at least it would have been more dynamic and engaging by the time like we got to the third act

[00:21:14] we had seen what chauncy really was like the first time it reveals itself I was like holy shit

[00:21:21] like that's really cool like that's a great design and that was really effective but after you've

[00:21:26] seen it a couple of times and they linger on shots of him and stuff it's like it stopped being scary

[00:21:31] yeah I mean we see a few shots of him throughout the film too like in the background or behind

[00:21:36] another character and I don't hate that intention that's always kind of my favorite scares when

[00:21:42] something is kind of in the background and isn't highlighted explicitly so no the best example

[00:21:46] that was the one in the bed at nighttime where he was at the edge of the bed yes yes that was

[00:21:52] really good that got me and you know but the another problem is this movie is shot so dark

[00:21:58] that there were times where I was like I think I can see what I'm supposed to be seeing but I can't

[00:22:02] see it so what are we doing here and to point out once we saw the design of like what chauncy's true

[00:22:07] form is similar to Pennywise in it's is kind of uninspired you know it's a little eerie but it's not

[00:22:14] it just kind of looks like the alien from asteroid city actually and I wasn't really quite sure what

[00:22:19] we were going for at that point because it wasn't scary well we also saw it at the very beginning of

[00:22:24] the movie like how couldn't believe that like you showed the true identity of this creature like

[00:22:30] in frame one you have broken the cardinal rule of a horror movie which is to hold back your monster

[00:22:36] until the end and wasn't that um supposed to be her spider creation in the beginning or did I

[00:22:41] just completely miss chauncy yeah but like like that's the many forms of this all I see you say it

[00:22:47] yeah and it manifests as that spider creature in her dream at the beginning but it also looks like

[00:22:52] that at the end of the movie and so just even like the finale I found to be so badly executed like

[00:22:58] we go into this imagination world where like literally anything can happen and it's like oh it's

[00:23:05] it's the esher drawing come to line okay I've seen that before it's so it's so like weak sauce

[00:23:12] you know when we get to the end you know when you do like one of those like haunted house like

[00:23:17] walkthroughs or not even like a haunted house but like a like a hall of mirrors or something

[00:23:23] like really cheesy like that this this from a production design standpoint just gave me

[00:23:29] this feeling of wow this really feels like it's being made for kids with very very minimal effort

[00:23:36] put into actually making this unsettling and spooky like I felt like I was watching almost um

[00:23:41] those old television episodes of goosebumps yeah sure it's almost like they're like you said

[00:23:47] there was already like stock scary without putting any sort of embellishment on it

[00:23:51] it looks just like that one painting or print with like all of those staircases that are like

[00:23:58] just kind of going around in circles and things are not actually going where you need them to go

[00:24:03] and I don't know if that's the most scary thing that you could possibly think of in like an imaginary

[00:24:10] land where again anything is open to you and everything is basically on the table but yeah it was a

[00:24:17] very lazy design um especially since wow you can go into this door or that door it's like wow okay

[00:24:28] I mean I also don't know too like what in what world do you think you're going to be able to

[00:24:32] create something that's going to wow an audience with a plum house level budget like

[00:24:38] plum houses way more effective when you lean into um I know Cody you said this like booze really

[00:24:44] dark but like imagine if the imaginary world was pitch black with glimmers of something you know

[00:24:53] emerging from the darkness that would be like more terrifying and that's like what your imagination

[00:24:57] is conjuring in those moments I don't know like I just kept thinking there's got to be a better

[00:25:01] way to present this in a way that could have been more scary yeah I guess but at that point the film

[00:25:06] I probably would be like oh they turned out in money you know because like when they went into the

[00:25:10] imaginary world I was a little bit surprised that there was something that was like clearly a set

[00:25:14] they had to build and yes it was poorly executed it just kind of reminded me of like

[00:25:19] as I may hear ever seen hellbound hellraiser 2 oh my god yeah the design of this kind of looks like

[00:25:26] again like hell junior you know where it's like oh I see MC Escher and oh there's clouds with

[00:25:33] thunder claps going it just was very first thought not best thought yeah but uh hellraiser had

[00:25:38] better matte painting so like well yes at least you got that this one is just oh it's so

[00:25:45] bland and so like generic looking and even when we then got more of this creature like

[00:25:53] I will give them this they clearly built a suit they built multiple suits and I will at least give

[00:25:57] them credit for that I'm glad we saw a physical creature interacting with the actors but it is so

[00:26:04] poorly shot and poorly kind of just designed even in general that it never for once did it not

[00:26:11] look like a guy in a suit and that also just completely dissipated any movie magic and be getting

[00:26:17] scared by this sequence because even though I appreciated the physicality of it the execution was

[00:26:22] just really really poor in showing this and was not scary at all. DeWanda Weiss is someone who

[00:26:30] is on the Netflix show or was on the Netflix show sorry it's no longer on anymore she's got to have

[00:26:36] it and she's been getting film roles like here and there mostly does television work

[00:26:42] of in the most part she's going to be an out of coming show three women pretty soon and I did think

[00:26:48] that they're like to give some credit if I if I can I actually did feel that she was doing the

[00:26:54] best that she could with the material that she was given to chart the emotions of that character

[00:27:00] and you know get us invested in what she was going through as this new not so much like new mom but

[00:27:08] someone who's really struggling to assimilate herself into that role and for like I'm listening

[00:27:18] I'm not saying it's great but I thought out of all the performances in this movie which I really

[00:27:23] thought across the board were terrible because of the dialogue that they were given she made the

[00:27:28] most of it and I thought she walked away the most unscathed from it. I would agree I mean

[00:27:34] I forget who said it earlier regarding the script but this does feel like one of the most like

[00:27:39] obligatory dramatic storylines in a horror movie that I've seen in a while it's like well we need to

[00:27:45] have one of these and the dialogue everything just feels so like okay you're supposed to have

[00:27:51] something along the lines of this and it's the most just boilerplate version of it. I agree she

[00:27:57] does the best job of like carrying it off but that's that's tough you know it's a tough job it's a

[00:28:02] thinkless job. Piper Braun who plays Alice in this movie has like the most cutesy cutesy kid voice

[00:28:11] you could possibly ever imagine. Certunicially so. That's the problem exactly it's it becomes

[00:28:20] so unserious and to me it just felt like they were always constantly having her say lines in a

[00:28:27] way where they just had in mind oh this will work well on a trailer yeah yeah I always feel kind

[00:28:33] of bad for kids in this situation because I blame the director obviously like clearly she was

[00:28:37] directed to have the most you know surely temple Gerber baby line readings when she wasn't

[00:28:44] possessed by this doll and then the most like shining lights you know we watched child's play once

[00:28:51] kind of spooky child line readings when she is possessed and neither works it is just so

[00:28:56] obvious and cliche and again I I lay it at the feet of the director. And then of course the

[00:29:02] teenager character Taylor just the most stereotypical oh I hate my stepmom I hate everything here

[00:29:12] suburbs yeah I hate the suburbs my life is ruined that one scene where they were telling

[00:29:19] um Jessica to make them a sandwich I was like these girls are so rude oh my god and Betty Buckley

[00:29:27] going oh my god I like that yeah okay yeah Betty Buckley I wanted more of her and I wanted more

[00:29:34] weirdness from her because yeah you get it a little bit in that sequence when the little girl comes up

[00:29:39] and she like tells her you know that's very rude and it's like a weird energy she was putting off

[00:29:44] but like when I was like I was so hungry for it's like I want more of that energy in this movie and

[00:29:49] you know Betty Buckley could deliver and they they flirt with it a little bit towards the end

[00:29:54] with like a somewhat twist with that character but it is far too little too late at that point like

[00:29:58] I needed more of whatever she was tapping into to be more present throughout this film. She has one

[00:30:04] really bizarre moment where they're in the dream world and she kind of like it's also like

[00:30:09] the camera does something weird here the camera pulls back above their head and she kind of extends

[00:30:13] her arms and goes it's incredible world of our imagination and I didn't really know what I was

[00:30:19] supposed to do with that and my audience just kind of sat silently which is I think the best thing

[00:30:25] you can do when you don't know what to do. I never think I will give her some credit for here

[00:30:29] is that even though I don't think the filmmakers knew exactly what kind of film they wanted to make

[00:30:34] I do think that just not Jesse Buckley whoa um Betty Buckley had an idea of what kind of a movie she

[00:30:43] was in and just ran with it. I don't know if that lined up with what Jeff Wadlow was doing

[00:30:49] necessarily but I agree Josh like whatever energy she was bringing to it I was like oh she probably

[00:30:56] thinks that she is in one of those camp fun horror movies that's gonna like you know play do

[00:31:02] like a broad audience but it didn't turn out to be that but the energy I felt like she was bringing

[00:31:07] to it certainly matched that because some of the lines that she has to say in terms of just

[00:31:13] exposition I was like she I was like this is so so hilarious to me um and I'm having fun with it

[00:31:22] because it's so terrible and yet I just I don't know there was something about like the way that

[00:31:28] she carried herself throughout this where I did feel like okay I think she's extremely self-aware

[00:31:34] but I don't think her and the director are aligned on that even necessarily. I'm on her side because

[00:31:41] at least she understood like this should be like a funny bad movie and we should all be not

[00:31:49] taking this as seriously as everybody else's and I feel like if they leaned in more with that we

[00:31:56] would have more fun talking about it. I mean because everything like with um you were saying before

[00:32:01] Taylor and who's the idiot hunk next door um of the neighbor kid. Oh my god I I saw into my

[00:32:12] chair so hard during every scene that that boy was a part of I oh yeah cringe there's a moment when

[00:32:20] I could forget who with the character's name that Betty Buckley plays but your first

[00:32:26] or is like old bag something and I remember you in that line it triggered something in me where

[00:32:31] it's like that sounds like a 50 year old remembering old horror movies and how young people reference

[00:32:36] old people that does not happen today so it felt like that character just had no sense of real identity

[00:32:43] it felt like like a caricature of a caricature and just completely empty like the comedy they tried

[00:32:51] to use him for was so terrible the scare sequence that they tried to also build around him was just

[00:32:58] very flat and uninspired everything about that character was terrible and even a Taylor I had to

[00:33:04] tell you my audience when I saw this movie was actively rooting for her to die they hate

[00:33:09] yeah I love that like RIP Taylor during many things they hated her so much oh my god that's amazing

[00:33:22] it was a totally thing about the movie my audience was comatose from start to finish so

[00:33:27] yeah my audience didn't react really to anything even the scenes where like I said there's maybe one

[00:33:34] or two good jumpscares in this and even in those moments I didn't get the sense that my audience was

[00:33:41] gasping or breathing a sigh of relief when the scene was over maybe maybe more so like oh god

[00:33:47] is this almost over and I can get out of here but not in the sense of oh man it was really scary

[00:33:52] you know nothing like that the one of the bedroom I think is the most effective one as we mentioned

[00:33:57] before where you can kind of see a slight movement and then she looks under the bed like

[00:34:01] that to me is the only one that really worked and once again for my audience like there were like

[00:34:06] this row of girls in front of me and they all very loudly screamed at that one so that was

[00:34:11] effective for them but it was about the only one that really was no because everything that we like

[00:34:16] happens in the third act especially is not scary no like at all I do think the teasing moments

[00:34:26] really on in the movie with Chancé can be creepy and effective but the problem is that it drags

[00:34:31] how for far too long before then it finally reveals its true nature maybe the best scene in the

[00:34:39] entire movie for me is the scene that involves Veronica Falcone the pharipist because of a couple

[00:34:50] of reasons here one is I just really really enjoyed watching her on Ozark and I was just happy to see

[00:34:57] her here two there is a line that she asks um that she asks the mother has she taken up any new hobbies

[00:35:06] such as ventriloquism that hadn't been rolling on the floor laughing that means a fire therapist

[00:35:13] if she's asking these questions but then I also thought too that the way that the possession

[00:35:19] was conveyed and how Alice was shown in like through the camcorder I thought all that was really

[00:35:27] really well done but it it unfortunately just isn't enough to obviously sustain an entire movie

[00:35:34] I do love when a child absolutely reads an adult for filth in a horror movie I feel like it happens

[00:35:39] a lot and in this one he was calling the pharipist grandkids ugly which is like okay rude

[00:35:46] also she like among the things where she was saying like oh she I just why would this child

[00:35:53] know about her three grandkids like why was the therapist not more concerned over the fact that

[00:35:59] this girl knew about her personal life like is she just totally like brushed over that fact

[00:36:06] because she was bringing up other things like you know she mentioned this or this reminds me of

[00:36:11] this case I'm like okay but she knows about your family life and that doesn't seem like

[00:36:16] something a five-year-old should know about she did with any sensical person would do which was

[00:36:22] here's the card for her friend I'm getting the hell out of here goodbye no instead she shows

[00:36:29] to the main character she breaks hip evaluations by showing another patient's video

[00:36:35] yeah she had no problem she was just like listen she's like the nanny I sense you're in trouble

[00:36:45] I'm on my way and here's a video and I am out actually you know what the best example of

[00:36:51] that in this movie is actually Tom Payne who plays the husband he was just like I'm gonna go play

[00:36:56] keep up with my band y'all have fun dealing with this murderous bear he just dips the entire movie

[00:37:03] the entire time after he left and we see what happens I was just like what is the conversation

[00:37:10] like between this family when he returns home like how do they explain all of these wounds

[00:37:16] how does he explain the house burning up in flames like what how do you just sit down with him and say

[00:37:23] yeah um there was a murderous bear yeah it was rough babe everything's okay between me my father

[00:37:32] you want to like I'm gonna go read in my story yeah the character yeah the character of the father

[00:37:40] was also just very much like a throwaway and the explanation for why he is the way that he is at

[00:37:48] the end is just just lol it was so manipulative to the point that I no I'm sorry no I needed this

[00:38:00] movie to be darker I needed this movie to one of two things like I said either lean into being

[00:38:06] darker and more serious with like a hard r rating or just do away with all this emotional tug of

[00:38:13] your heartstrings like crap and just have fun with it and go buck wild you know with some of the

[00:38:19] creativity that you can get from a premise like this instead they're trying to like introduce

[00:38:24] like all this family drama and it's like we don't care we're not emotionally invested I'm sorry

[00:38:30] the writing is not there it's not good enough to justify this much focus on it yeah exactly

[00:38:36] all right final thoughts here this is gonna be a short one people I'm sorry like I just don't

[00:38:40] want to come off as repetitious but there's not much to really say here um Emma we're gonna go

[00:38:45] to you any final thoughts you have on imaginary history is complicated the story of human progress

[00:38:56] is long messy and riddled with controversies big and small on conflicted we dive headfirst in

[00:39:03] history's most infamous events and contentious figures we try and untangle the good from the bad

[00:39:10] the fact from the fiction and the monsters from the misunderstood was jingus con a murderous butcher

[00:39:17] or a civic pioneer did the allied powers go too far in fire bombing the german city of

[00:39:23] dresden at the twilight of world war two and how did the marquee decide acquire such a sinister

[00:39:29] reputation and was any of it true these are just a few of the tough questions we wrestle with

[00:39:36] and investigate on conflicted so if you love history or just enjoy a good story please join me

[00:39:43] your host Zach Cornwell for a fascinating new topic each and every month conflicted a history

[00:39:49] podcast is available on Spotify Apple or wherever else you get your podcasts I hope to see you soon

[00:40:07] to be quite honest no like I said I feel like the dad was the best character in this because he got

[00:40:14] the fuck out of there and he didn't have to deal with any of this shit and I would absolutely do

[00:40:18] the same thing so all of my star ratings go to him and his decision and you know what he's

[00:40:25] clearly a rock star like like his five I like his fashion sense oh yeah oh I did not know

[00:40:32] yeah it was like early 2010 oh god no I like it in the sense for how generic it is is what I was

[00:40:40] trying to get ahead but yeah I also like I don't know when this film takes place and I don't care

[00:40:47] enough to realize if it is in the modern day if it's like his fashion sense is giving me like

[00:40:53] 2000's vibes everybody here does not know where technology stands at this point so we're all confused

[00:41:03] all right deniel a Castro well you mentioned the hallway jump scare the one that was like

[00:41:08] featured really heavily in the trailer and that you know that's one of the better ones I can see

[00:41:13] where they put it in the trailer to sort of draw people in but it's just like a blatant ripoff

[00:41:18] what is it shock from the 70s the Mario Boba movie like it's just they just straight up rip that

[00:41:25] setup in terms of like where the camera is the whole execution scene so like even some of the stuff

[00:41:30] that I do think is like decently effective it's just straight up just a lift in from other stuff

[00:41:35] that's better and I think that's sort of indicative of the kind of quality we're dealing with

[00:41:40] so that that's sort of the last little throw-in but yeah I mean everything else I'm going to say

[00:41:45] here's just going to be repetitive all right Josh yeah a couple things actually at the end I will

[00:41:51] say that some of the few effectively like creepy moments that were that I do think work for me is

[00:41:58] that there are some instances where you can actually see that the eyes of the bear changes between

[00:42:04] certain shots in terms of kind of signaling an emotional state that it's in and like it's pretty

[00:42:10] subtle and you may not even notice it at first but that was one decision they made with like okay

[00:42:15] I'll give them credit that's that's actually like something on a subtler side of things that can

[00:42:21] be a bit unsettling and I'll give them that as their most effective form of creating some tension

[00:42:28] or suspense or whatever and and I also even feel like the like the the button eyes that people had

[00:42:34] at the end worked the first time I think when they kept going back to it it wasn't great after that

[00:42:39] but an interesting idea that maybe wasn't fully executed as well as it could be like a lot of

[00:42:46] stuff in this movie even though the button eyes also then reminded me of Coraline so it also

[00:42:51] another thing that it was like ripping off too but it's like an interesting idea not great execution

[00:42:56] all the way through and then the last thing is also in the finale section when they're in the bedroom

[00:43:03] and they have to figure out how to get out and they take everything that's blue and just put it

[00:43:07] on the wall it's a terrible idea it's really dumb and it felt like they're trying to write

[00:43:11] themselves out of a corner but the one thing it did do is that it reminded me of return to Oz

[00:43:18] at the end of that movie they had to find the green things and it's like well congratulations

[00:43:22] you've just now reminded me of another movie I wish I was watching is actually much scarier than

[00:43:26] the movie I'm watching right now but that little moment just reminded me of another film that I

[00:43:30] wanted to mention all right and Cody Derrick's so I didn't really get to talk about the more

[00:43:36] confusing elements of this green play I know I mentioned it like contradicts itself frequently

[00:43:40] I think the most glaring example of this is and I'm not somebody who really cares about like

[00:43:45] plot holes or mistakes or sin sin a mess and you know all this stuff that's become like online

[00:43:51] critique fodder I don't really give a shit but when it distracts me actively during the movie then

[00:43:57] I think it is a problem and the it's established early on that's this is the main character's

[00:44:03] happy place you know they keep talking about this house it's something she has a lot of great memories

[00:44:08] from they usually use the phrase happy place two or three times but at the same time they make it very

[00:44:12] clear that she doesn't have any memories of her childhood she remembers nothing about what happened

[00:44:16] you know in the house all this traumatic stuff also she points out she has five much you moved out

[00:44:21] she doesn't really have any memories so I don't really understand how these two things can be

[00:44:26] can gel together because unless I'm wrong the movie kind of makes a point to establish like

[00:44:30] she hasn't been here since she was five unless I miss something it just was very kind of indicative of

[00:44:36] the general perspective and like through line of the screenplay that it was disconfused about

[00:44:41] something as basic as the characters you know exposition and relationship to the main setting

[00:44:47] and I think that kind of energy flows throughout the entire film and also the their mother

[00:44:54] like everything with her it was like you were getting piecemeal information about her and I still

[00:45:00] don't understand what's going on with that woman she's having a hard time being a mom I know so yes

[00:45:07] I mean the reveal that chauncy is not actually real like never was there for Alice and it's all about

[00:45:17] Jessica I actually did think that that reveal was pretty good but once again

[00:45:25] I'm not emotionally invested by that point in the movie because everything else around it is just

[00:45:30] not up to par with the ideas that are at play here I actually do think once again that the premise

[00:45:37] of this has a lot of potential but I just feel that they squandered at every turn with just some

[00:45:44] really poor storytelling I mentioned earlier the therapists who's like here's a number for someone

[00:45:51] call them who who is that person Jessica never calls that person it feels like that that was

[00:45:56] like a deleted scene or something that wasn't that never made the final movie so it's just like

[00:46:01] poor execution all throughout here one of her final thought this is not Molly this is my allergy

[00:46:10] medication that I keep it a Ziploc bag it definitely was Molly she's just covering up

[00:46:18] oh my gosh oh that was a bad that was really really bad but actually kind of genuinely hilarious

[00:46:26] there was one point in the movie where I think it was Alice pointed out to Jessica he's imaginary

[00:46:33] and I ended up doing the Leo point to the screen you know one scene that I thought was pretty like

[00:46:41] good in terms of the creepy levels was when she's having the tea party with the bear and then

[00:46:47] Jessica hears that a woman's voice like calls back and she was like what the fuck who is in here

[00:46:54] that actually got me really good when it was then like she gets tackled and you find

[00:46:58] it's such a dumb like reveal it's the ex-wife well yeah and that's what I was saying like I don't

[00:47:03] know what is going on with the ex-wife throughout this entire film like I I can tell that she is not

[00:47:10] in a good place but I was like what happened here and why couldn't that not tie into the overall

[00:47:16] story then in that case too right but I will say though yes the reveal of like Jessica

[00:47:21] gang tackled by a physical like woman in that moment did shock me and like kind of jolt to be in my

[00:47:27] seat I was like what is happening you know but then when they said it's my crazy ex-wife who

[00:47:32] like broke out the mental asylum I was like this is so stupid yeah the beginning of that was

[00:47:40] actually like a really interesting idea and I liked the setup but once again the follow through

[00:47:46] and the execution just so so poor and yeah as I was mentioned then we get like nothing more

[00:47:51] of that character that seems like should have more relevance to this story but nope it was like

[00:47:56] just used for one kind of cheap jump scare and then that was it and so bad remind me again is

[00:48:03] there a line in this that is a I maybe I'm imagining this but I sort of wrote this down on my notes

[00:48:09] and I just want to know if someone can confirm from me is there indeed a moment here where somebody

[00:48:13] where somebody says a line that is something similar to I'm gonna destroy this bear I'm gonna kill

[00:48:20] this bear I'm gonna like you know burn this bear I don't know something along the lines the main

[00:48:25] to main character right before is revealed that there there is no bear she goes I know I have to do

[00:48:30] I have to destroy that bear and it's like nearly triumphant but then immediately undercut by the

[00:48:35] reveal that the bear is not real I mean I just wish this movie had a hard r-rating just so that we

[00:48:40] could have gotten like a line like I'm gonna fuck this bear up or something it just it could have been

[00:48:46] so much better it could have been so much more fun yeah but as is it's a major disappointment

[00:48:52] a miss for Blumhouse like you said earlier Cody um this is not the worst film I've seen

[00:48:57] this year but it's pretty damn close I'm giving it a two out of ten Denilla what about you

[00:49:02] yeah yeah two for me that's uh that sums it up pretty easily Emma I gave it a four out of ten

[00:49:08] initially but I think I will be knocking it down to three out of ten for this rating

[00:49:13] Cody I'm out of three out of ten I was thinking about it too but I'm gonna give a little bit of

[00:49:19] credit to the amount of like actors and costumes and practical effects which you know if it was

[00:49:24] 15 to 20 years ago I would be considering but I I'm always happy to see that even in a

[00:49:30] piece of shit movie like this yeah I was gonna say too I can't even applaud them for that because

[00:49:34] I imagine that that was done more for budget constraints more than artistic vision so that's like

[00:49:40] I can't give them the benefit of the doubt here on short. Sure but I'm just happy to see it

[00:49:45] and like I saw early in the credits that it said like special makeup effects by so I was already

[00:49:49] kind of prepared for something a bit more hands-on than just a bunch of CGI images. That makes sense

[00:49:55] Josh what about you yeah when I walked down I gave it a four out of ten and I think that actually

[00:50:01] is where I'm gonna stay like I've said before that once I get below a four that stuff that I

[00:50:06] actively like really don't like and the movie just didn't inspire that much of an emotion for me

[00:50:12] like I said either way I did not really feel anything while watching this movie so like it's

[00:50:18] somewhat competently made and it's got a few decent moments that'll work fine I guess but

[00:50:25] I didn't actively hate the movie that's the thing I just found it to be so bland and forgettable

[00:50:29] that it's like whatever and that to me is where like a four out of ten is something like this really

[00:50:35] did give me a deeper appreciation for why something like Megan worked as well as it did yes and

[00:50:43] we all I'm saying is that's we need more of that I think that we need to just lean into one side

[00:50:48] or the other but trying to find this like happy middle ground here it's just not gonna work for

[00:50:53] today's audiences even if this film because I will give it this too it has had effective marketing

[00:50:59] to where people are gonna probably check it out I imagine but I think they are gonna walk out of

[00:51:03] it very very disappointed in the end yeah Megan is a movie with personality to it yeah and when

[00:51:10] you have a CGI bear that is expressionless and has no personality it's like what are we doing

[00:51:17] anyway this movie made me want to impale myself with a nail so yeah that's so that's how I feel

[00:51:23] about it's Oscar potential and that's how I feel about the movie yeah no no no no no no no

[00:51:30] so with that said I'm a sassick where can they find you on the internet you can find me on Twitter

[00:51:34] at Emma underscore sassick and letterbox and Instagram at Emma sassick did he have a castra

[00:51:41] on twitter at denieless castra kody darrix twitter letterboxed instagram everywhere at kody

[00:51:47] monster 91 if you want to hear me talk about some some better horror movies listen to my podcast

[00:51:52] follow readers of horror movie podcast and chosh parm you can find me on twitter and letterboxed

[00:51:57] jr parm and you can find me at next best picture thank you so much everyone for listening to

[00:52:02] the next best picture podcast we are proud to be part of the evergreen podcast network and

[00:52:06] you can subscribe to us anywhere where you subscribe to podcasts be sure to leave a

[00:52:11] review on apple podcast so let us know what you think of the show we really appreciate your

[00:52:15] feedback and your support which you can also lend on for at patreon for one dollar minimum

[00:52:21] a month you'll get some exclusive podcast content from us thank you all so much for listening

[00:52:26] as always we will see you all next time

[00:52:56] let's

[00:53:11] with lucky land slots you can get lucky just about anywhere

[00:53:15] dearly beloved we are gathered here today to has anyone seen the bride and groom

[00:53:20] sorry sorry we're here we were getting lucky in the limo when we lost track of time

[00:53:25] no lucky land casino with cash prizes that add up quicker than a guest registry

[00:53:29] in that case i pronounce you lucky

[00:53:32] thanks for free at luckyland slots dot com daily bonuses are waiting no purchase necessary

[00:53:37] void were prohibited by law 18 plus terms and conditions apply see website for details