In this episode of 'Editorial', Mr. Sujit Nair discusses Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud's comments regarding Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi's actions. The Supreme Court expressed dissatisfaction with Governor Ravi for refusing to reinstate MLA K Ponmudi as a Minister despite his conviction being suspended by the Supreme Court. CJI Chandrachud said, “""Mr Attorney General, what is your Governor doing? The conviction has been stayed by the Supreme Court and the Governor says he won't swear him in! We will have to make some serious observations. Please tell your governor, we are going to take a serious view of it. How can the Governor say that, after the Supreme Court stayed his conviction, his reinduction as a Minister will be against Constitutional Morality?, The bench comprising CJI DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra was hearing an application filed by the Tamil Nadu Government seeking a direction to the Governor to accept the recommendation made by the Chief Minister to reappoint Ponmudi as Minister.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
[00:00:00] Hello and welcome to HW Editorial with me Sujit Nair.
[00:00:07] Here you can listen to my views, my analysis.
[00:00:11] Follow this podcast to stay updated.
[00:00:13] At HW News they have been delivering news that matters to you.
[00:00:17] Our goal is to present you with information that stimulates conversations around topic
[00:00:22] of larger public importance.
[00:00:24] That often gets lost in prime time shows.
[00:00:31] Namaste, Khyal.
[00:00:41] Welcome to another interesting episode of Editorial.
[00:00:50] Recently nowadays I am getting a lot of interesting stories.
[00:00:53] Possibly a lot of interesting things are happening around us.
[00:00:56] Today yet another very interesting story.
[00:01:00] The chief justice calls the Attorney General of India and says,
[00:01:06] What is your governor doing?
[00:01:12] The governor he is referring to is Mr R and Ravi.
[00:01:17] Well, like I said very interesting let us get into the show.
[00:01:23] Okay so there was this former minister of DMK called Mr K Punmudi.
[00:01:32] K Punmudi was there was an allegation of disproportionate asset against him.
[00:01:38] So there was investigation.
[00:01:41] Now the DMK government went up to the Supreme Court.
[00:01:44] Supreme Court stayed the investigation, stayed the case and reinstated Mr Punmudi as MLA.
[00:01:53] Now when the Supreme Court reinstated Mr Punmudi as MLA because he was removed
[00:01:59] when the investigation was on disproportionate asset.
[00:02:02] So when he was reinstated as MLA,
[00:02:05] DMK went out and told Mr R and Ravi the governor of Tamil Nadu that he is getting back
[00:02:12] making him a minister.
[00:02:13] Okay right, he is back, he is an MLA now.
[00:02:17] R and Ravi said, no, I am not going to do it.
[00:02:23] DMK went to Supreme Court saying that you reinstated him and now he is not being allowed
[00:02:29] to be a minister to which Chandrachud was surprised he said,
[00:02:34] what is happening in fact, what he said is he said Mr Attorney General that is what he was
[00:02:39] referring to. He was talking to Mr Venkatramani who is the Attorney General of India by the way.
[00:02:45] Mr Attorney General, what is your governor doing?
[00:02:49] The conviction has been stayed by the Supreme Court and the governor says he wants
[00:02:54] to be a minister.
[00:02:55] We will have to make some serious observation.
[00:02:58] Please tell your governor we are going to take serious view of it.
[00:03:04] The court said, we will take some serious observation.
[00:03:08] Kaya, we give a verdict, we give a judgment and your governor doesn't care about it.
[00:03:14] What is wrong with you guys?
[00:03:17] In fact, the chief justice went on to say that how can governor
[00:03:22] say that after the Supreme Court stayed his conviction, his re-induction as a minister will be
[00:03:29] against Constitution morality. This is what the chief justice said.
[00:03:34] We said no, we have reinstated him.
[00:03:36] What do you mean it is against Constitutional morality?
[00:03:40] We decided no, we said no.
[00:03:42] What is wrong with your governor? I also think, what is wrong with the governor when the
[00:03:47] chief justice is saying it. You see, he went on to say Mr. Aji, we are seriously concerned about
[00:03:53] the contact of the governor in this issue. We did not want to say it out loud in the court,
[00:03:58] but you are now constraining us to say it aloud. This is not the way he's defining the Supreme
[00:04:06] Court of India when two judge bench of the Supreme Court stays a conviction that governor has no
[00:04:13] business to tell us that this does not wipe off the conviction and that it is nonexistent.
[00:04:21] That means that those who have advised him have not advised him correctly in accordance with law.
[00:04:27] Now, the governor better be informed that when the Supreme Court of India
[00:04:33] stays a conviction, the law has to follow course. In fact, he said we will keep tomorrow.
[00:04:41] We will leave to the governor till tomorrow otherwise.
[00:04:46] The CJI must have got seriously, seriously peved off with what happened.
[00:04:54] He says possibly the people who advised your governor advised him wrong. Now see there is
[00:04:59] another very interesting aspect of it. You see, the fact that you don't know law doesn't
[00:05:06] entitle you to breach the law. When a Supreme Court has made a judgment,
[00:05:12] he has reinstated the Supreme Court of two bench justice has reinstated the MLA. The MLA is reinstated.
[00:05:21] How can the governor say that for morally, I don't think it is right morally. I don't know.
[00:05:29] What are we talking about? And this is the are the steps that have been taken
[00:05:36] by a lot of governors and a lot of constitutional authority in our country.
[00:05:41] Steps which are undermining the judiciary, steps which actually is now undermining law
[00:05:50] steps which are now undermining the process of our constitution and the process in which our
[00:05:57] country works. Why I see this? You saw what happened in Maharashtra. The Supreme Court kept on
[00:06:04] asking the speaker of the house of Maharashtra to take a decision on the on the disqualification
[00:06:10] of 16 MLAs and it went on dragging and dragging and dragging and dragging and dragging till sustained
[00:06:16] that. Now when the decision was taken, it was at the decision of course was for Iqnath
[00:06:23] Shinde Sena or whatever the Shiva Sena. Even then the decision was too late for anything to be
[00:06:30] done by anybody. So the fact made that somewhere down the line, speakers of the house,
[00:06:37] constitutional bodies like I told you, speakers and governors. I mean they are almost
[00:06:43] taking the court to be a joke. And all of a sudden the chief justice of India which I am
[00:06:51] very glad is now acting and talking. This is something that I am seeing as a very welcome sign
[00:07:01] because normally there were only observations. Now it is followed up by action which we saw in
[00:07:08] the electoral bonds. So somewhere down the line, it's a very welcome sign. So when something good
[00:07:14] happens, we say something good happens. When something good doesn't happen and only talk happens,
[00:07:19] we also comment report to you that only talk is happening, nothing good is happening. So this is one
[00:07:24] case which I wanted to get your notice. This governor better act and this governor better understand
[00:07:30] that there are laws just because he's been made a governor that doesn't mean he's the king of
[00:07:35] the state or that doesn't mean he's above every law. That doesn't mean that no law, nothing
[00:07:40] democracy, you know voting, shooting and all which we do, vote, we do not, it doesn't matter,
[00:07:44] the ram governor everything okay with me, he is up and that's something that he better realises
[00:07:50] and the CJA in no uncertain terms has made it clear to him. Now see let's see what he does.
[00:07:58] Now I want to before I close I want to discuss one more issue with you which is a very interesting
[00:08:02] issue. You see there was this additional session judge of Barely Ravi Kumar Diwakar. So Judge
[00:08:08] Ravi Kumar Diwakar is a very he's very enamored or very happy with the fact that Mr. Yogi Adityanath
[00:08:15] is the chief minister of Uttarpathy, she's very happy about that is what one feels, one understands
[00:08:20] okay I'll tell you why he I say this. I say this because you know this judge of Barely called
[00:08:28] Ravi Kumar Diwakar he said that the main reason for riots in India is that political parties are
[00:08:35] the country and engagement of a particular religion, appeasement of a particular religion.
[00:08:40] I presume he spoke speaking about appeasement of Muslims, judge judge so there apart from that
[00:08:47] he also likened CM Adityanath to the idea of a philosopher king as outlined by Plato in his
[00:08:56] Socrates' dialogue he likened Yogi Adityanath to that of a philosopher king so a constitutional judge
[00:09:07] judge appointed by the colosium and the person who is supposed to guard our constitution calls
[00:09:14] a chief minister a philosopher king that's what his statement and he went on to say that the
[00:09:23] head of power should be religious person because the life of a religious person is not one of
[00:09:30] enjoyment but of sacrifice and dedication. The example of this is the Peter Deshwar of the great
[00:09:36] Siddha Pit Ghorakna temple, Mhand Baba Sri Yogi Adityanath Ji who is currently chief minister of Uttarpadesh
[00:09:45] and has proven the above concept to be true stated additional district judge fast-track code
[00:09:51] Ravi Kumar Devaka and this incidentally the alabat I quote on Tuesday expunge the remark made by
[00:10:00] this additional session judge bench saying that Baba said you know what this is unoriented
[00:10:05] remark and containing political overtones and personal views a bench of justice Ram Manur
[00:10:11] Narayan Mishra observed it that it is not expected from a judicial officer to express his
[00:10:17] depicts his personal or preconceived notions for inclination in the matter.
[00:10:25] The judge says that you see the problem of riots is because of one particular community
[00:10:29] because people are opposing one particular community which I like either it is Muslim
[00:10:35] could be Muslim by one that's what it indicates to at least to my knowledge my understanding
[00:10:41] and secondly he says you know our chief minister is philosopher King he says and he he describes the
[00:10:51] chief minister with his his official and his religious designations and says that look how
[00:10:59] how true it is proven that a religious person should be made the king or the leader the chief
[00:11:07] minister I want to ask you two questions before I end my show number one is do you think that a
[00:11:15] leader has got anything to do with religion which means that if a person is religious he proves
[00:11:21] to be a good leader or if a person is religious it doesn't prove to be a good leader also has leadership
[00:11:27] running estate anything to do with religion number one question number two question for the judge
[00:11:34] a person who is supposed to guard the constitution addresses a chief minister as philosopher King
[00:11:42] king is that fair just by expunging that statement is everything over
[00:11:51] that's the point I will leave you with that's the thought I will leave with write down your comments
[00:11:56] let me know what you feel till I see you next time much care
[00:12:27] if you like this episode please rate us with five stars right now
[00:12:40] hw news podcast are available on binge spots and all other audio platforms also don't miss to
[00:12:47] check out our news reports from the house of hw news podcast we are sure you will love it too


