Although the CBI special court examined as many as 351 prosecution witnesses — including journalists, locals and police/government officials — Special CBI judge SK Yadav observed there was no conclusive proof that the 1992 demolition was a pre-planned criminal conspiracy, and held that it was just a “spontaneous outpouring of emotions”.
In fact, he notes that some of the accused tried to stop the "anti-social elements" that were engaged in the destruction of the mosque.
Welcoming the verdict, while Advani said that it is a vindication of his personal belief and the BJP’s belief and their commitment toward the Ram Janmabhoomi movement, leaders of opposition from the Congress, AIMIM and CPI(M) are all calling this a “travesty of justice” and asking who is it then that brought down the Babri Masjid?
The judgment is a whopping 2,300 pages and the finer details are yet to be reviewed fully, but how should we be looking at the judgment? Did the fact that it has been going on for close to 3 decades, affect the handling of the case? Tune in to The Big Story!
References:
Producer and Host: Shorbori Purkayastha
Guests:
Vakasha Sachdev, Legal Editor of The Quint Sanjay Hegde, Senior Advocate at the Supreme Court Nilanjan Mukhopadhyay, Senior Journalist Sudhanshu Mittal, BJP Politician Editor: Shelly Walia
Music: Big Bang Fuzz
Listen to The Big Story podcast on:
Apple: https://apple.co/2AYdLIl Saavn: http://bit.ly/2oix78C Google Podcasts: http://bit.ly/2ntMV7S Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2IyLAUQ Deezer: http://bit.ly/2Vrf5Ng
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices


