Succession Planning in Corporate India: Successes & Failures
Reputation MattersAugust 21, 202400:34:34

Succession Planning in Corporate India: Successes & Failures

In this informative episode of Reputation Matters, host Anupam Gupta discusses with Mitu Samarnath Jha, founder of Eminence Strategy Consulting the complex world of succession planning in corporate India. They explore two fascinating case studies: Infosys and Axis Bank, both of which faced significant challenges during their succession planning processes. Learn about the intricate dynamics, the role of the board, and the lessons that can be drawn from these high-profile transitions. This episode is a must-listen for anyone interested in corporate governance and organizational leadership. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this informative episode of Reputation Matters, host Anupam Gupta discusses with Mitu Samarnath Jha, founder of Eminence Strategy Consulting the complex world of succession planning in corporate India. 

They explore two fascinating case studies: Infosys and Axis Bank, both of which faced significant challenges during their succession planning processes. Learn about the intricate dynamics, the role of the board, and the lessons that can be drawn from these high-profile transitions. This episode is a must-listen for anyone interested in corporate governance and organizational leadership.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

[00:00:14] [SPEAKER_00]: Hello and welcome to Reputation Matters, a show about corporate reputation, how companies

[00:00:19] [SPEAKER_00]: face crisis, survive crisis and what are the learnings from all of this.

[00:00:23] [SPEAKER_00]: My guest Mitu Samarnath, founder of Eminence Consulting, a strategy consulting firm, Mitu

[00:00:28] [SPEAKER_00]: welcome to the show.

[00:00:29] [SPEAKER_01]: Thank you Anupam.

[00:00:30] [SPEAKER_00]: Today we have got a very interesting topic, one that is very relevant to corporate India

[00:00:34] [SPEAKER_00]: Succession Planning.

[00:00:34] [SPEAKER_00]: A Deloitte reporter, early 2024 says that over 70% of companies in India have succession

[00:00:40] [SPEAKER_00]: planning in place but only 27% succeed.

[00:00:45] [SPEAKER_00]: While we believe that most challenges lie within family-owned companies, which is what

[00:00:48] [SPEAKER_00]: succession planning probably is about, handing over from one generation to another generation

[00:00:53] [SPEAKER_00]: but in today's episode, these two companies are not family-owned, both of them are professional

[00:00:58] [SPEAKER_00]: and they are very interesting because both of them faced a succession planning issue.

[00:01:03] [SPEAKER_00]: The first is Infosys, the second is Access Bank.

[00:01:06] [SPEAKER_00]: Let's start with Infosys, the storied bellwether of Indian IT companies, the poster boy for

[00:01:13] [SPEAKER_00]: a lot of things for middle-class aspirations.

[00:01:16] [SPEAKER_00]: What really happened out here?

[00:01:18] [SPEAKER_01]: Typically, Infosys we all know and have read things about it in terms of what great

[00:01:23] [SPEAKER_01]: things they have done, how they have got India onto the global map and so on,

[00:01:27] [SPEAKER_01]: So all positive things we ever read and heard about the company but this time around it was

[00:01:34] [SPEAKER_01]: hitting headline for the negative reasons and without doubt it will catch attention.

[00:01:41] [SPEAKER_01]: So let me just step back and give you a slight context of what really happened.

[00:01:45] [SPEAKER_01]: So since beginning, it's been run by or led by one of the founders.

[00:01:50] [SPEAKER_01]: So in 2011 when Shibu Lal took over the reins of the company, it started seeing couple of challenges.

[00:02:00] [SPEAKER_01]: So the revenues and profits started seeing a setback, there were some senior level exits as well

[00:02:07] [SPEAKER_01]: and while Narayan Moothee had retired in 2011 and he had very publicly announced his retirement

[00:02:17] [SPEAKER_01]: He was brought in back to set things in order in 2013 if I'm not wrong and he was brought in for about five years.

[00:02:28] [SPEAKER_01]: The mandate given to him was to get the company back on track.

[00:02:32] [SPEAKER_01]: However, while the performance improved to some extent but the exits continued,

[00:02:39] [SPEAKER_01]: the attrition was a challenge plus Rohan Moothee, Narayan Moothee's son who was brought in as the EA.

[00:02:45] [SPEAKER_01]: His entry also was precisely.

[00:02:49] [SPEAKER_01]: So all that confusion was going on in the organization.

[00:02:54] [SPEAKER_01]: During that time Vishal Sikha was brought in from SAP and his task was very clear.

[00:03:01] [SPEAKER_01]: He had to stand in the core of the company, he had to bring back the company in the leadership position

[00:03:10] [SPEAKER_01]: because during that time the margins between TCS and Infosys was actually widening.

[00:03:20] [SPEAKER_01]: So TCS was growing much faster and Infosys wasn't really growing as fast.

[00:03:25] [SPEAKER_01]: On the other hand, the margin with Cognizant was actually narrowing.

[00:03:30] [SPEAKER_01]: So again, Cognizant was catching up but Infy wasn't going that far.

[00:03:34] [SPEAKER_00]: And again here the founders, the original founders of Infosys had moved out completely.

[00:03:38] [SPEAKER_00]: So Mr. Sikha was given a complete free hand without any interference from anybody if I recall correctly.

[00:03:44] [SPEAKER_01]: So that was assumed that that would happen exactly.

[00:03:49] [SPEAKER_01]: And hence Mr. Narayan Moothee while he was brought in in 2013, he exited in the year 2014

[00:03:55] [SPEAKER_01]: as soon as Vishal Sikha joined into sometime around that.

[00:04:00] [SPEAKER_01]: So clearly it was assumed that now the promoters or the founders have completely

[00:04:06] [SPEAKER_01]: given the reins of the company to a new set of professional managers.

[00:04:12] [SPEAKER_01]: Right? And which is again in the textbook the way we read, that's the ideal way to go about it.

[00:04:17] [SPEAKER_00]: That's also such a learning happens.

[00:04:19] [SPEAKER_01]: Correct. So the expectation was that the company will again start thriving,

[00:04:24] [SPEAKER_01]: the new infusion of energy will come in and so on.

[00:04:30] [SPEAKER_01]: However, Vishal Sikha he kept facing two big challenges.

[00:04:35] [SPEAKER_01]: Number one, of course the business environment was tough.

[00:04:38] [SPEAKER_01]: He was trying to like I mentioned that there were senior level exits.

[00:04:42] [SPEAKER_01]: So he had to rebuild the team.

[00:04:44] [SPEAKER_01]: Then he had to claim back some of the businesses and the leadership position like I mentioned.

[00:04:49] [SPEAKER_01]: So all those business related challenges he had to deal with.

[00:04:53] [SPEAKER_01]: He had to parallelly deal with public questioning of his conduct at various levels.

[00:05:01] [SPEAKER_01]: For instance, of course he was brought in at a very high salary.

[00:05:05] [SPEAKER_01]: And subsequently he got a very high raise as well.

[00:05:10] [SPEAKER_01]: So his salary was somewhere around 48-50 crores in those days which was way higher than

[00:05:15] [SPEAKER_01]: what a TCS or a Vipro CEO was getting at that point in time.

[00:05:20] [SPEAKER_01]: So certainly this was a matter of question for the founders who kind of grew the company

[00:05:27] [SPEAKER_01]: in a very frugal manner.

[00:05:28] [SPEAKER_01]: They talked about practicing simplicity and all.

[00:05:32] [SPEAKER_01]: Always they were known for that.

[00:05:33] [SPEAKER_01]: They were known for that right?

[00:05:34] [SPEAKER_01]: So for them at least the way Mr. Narayan Murti brought it out that it was not something

[00:05:41] [SPEAKER_01]: which is the infosys way of going about it.

[00:05:43] [SPEAKER_00]: The major change in personality of the top leadership.

[00:05:46] [SPEAKER_00]: Exactly.

[00:05:46] [SPEAKER_00]: Going from one set of thoughts to another set of thoughts, high salary, low salary,

[00:05:51] [SPEAKER_00]: frugality, extravagance so please yeah.

[00:05:53] [SPEAKER_01]: Totally.

[00:05:53] [SPEAKER_01]: So that was one challenge that his salary itself was questioned.

[00:05:58] [SPEAKER_01]: Secondly, the severance package that was given to the CFO at that point in time.

[00:06:03] [SPEAKER_01]: That was also quite handsome and again that came under question that why such a thing

[00:06:09] [SPEAKER_01]: happened and we all know that it's not only Vishal Sikha who would make such a decision.

[00:06:15] [SPEAKER_01]: So it was in tandem with the thought process of the board but the way questioning

[00:06:21] [SPEAKER_01]: was directed, it was directed personally on Mr. Vishal Sikha.

[00:06:25] [SPEAKER_00]: And of course then there was one of the most prominent headlines that that point in time

[00:06:30] [SPEAKER_00]: was the Panaya acquisition.

[00:06:31] [SPEAKER_00]: Correct absolutely.

[00:06:33] [SPEAKER_01]: So that was the third challenge that he had to deal with because there were two

[00:06:36] [SPEAKER_01]: whistleblower complaints on Panaya acquisition that it was not done with a completely

[00:06:44] [SPEAKER_01]: corporate governance practice which is again another cultural disconnect.

[00:06:48] [SPEAKER_00]: And all these three were playing out in the public eye.

[00:06:51] [SPEAKER_01]: Precisely and Infosys is known like you talked about the fact that having simple

[00:06:55] [SPEAKER_01]: lifestyle.

[00:06:56] [SPEAKER_01]: Second, about high standards of corporate governance.

[00:07:00] [SPEAKER_01]: So this episode actually was an absolute opposite of the standard perception of Infosys.

[00:07:06] [SPEAKER_00]: I'm going to just talk a little bit about the corporate governance out there because

[00:07:09] [SPEAKER_00]: Infosys listed I believe in 92 or 93 and before Sebi made it mandatory as part of

[00:07:16] [SPEAKER_00]: the listing agreement for listed companies, their level of disclosure in quarterly reports

[00:07:21] [SPEAKER_00]: in annual reports was teller.

[00:07:23] [SPEAKER_00]: Correct.

[00:07:24] [SPEAKER_00]: They set the standard and if the viewers want to just go and check out Infosys' website,

[00:07:30] [SPEAKER_00]: they have every annual report since 1993, the time that they were listed.

[00:07:35] [SPEAKER_00]: So if you want to know what we are talking about out here, check out those annual

[00:07:39] [SPEAKER_00]: reports of that era and see how they had audit committees, nomination committees,

[00:07:43] [SPEAKER_00]: all of this much before this became mandatory by Sebi for all listed companies.

[00:07:49] [SPEAKER_00]: So they set the standard for corporate governance, not just for IT companies,

[00:07:52] [SPEAKER_00]: for corporate India and for them to see this.

[00:07:55] [SPEAKER_00]: You're right.

[00:07:56] [SPEAKER_00]: Go on please.

[00:07:56] [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah.

[00:07:57] [SPEAKER_01]: So this happened in a lot of public outcry around this happened by Mr. Narayan Murti

[00:08:04] [SPEAKER_01]: because he kept questioning that this is not the Infosys way of doing things.

[00:08:10] [SPEAKER_01]: So much so that it went on for a few months, almost about a year that eventually Vishal

[00:08:17] [SPEAKER_01]: Sikha ended up resigning and in his resignation he clearly mentioned that the primary reason

[00:08:24] [SPEAKER_01]: of his exit is continuous personal attacks, interference, all of that.

[00:08:32] [SPEAKER_01]: So this suddenly then conversation took a completely different direction.

[00:08:36] [SPEAKER_01]: All experts started talking about how founders or family owned companies do not let go of the reins

[00:08:46] [SPEAKER_01]: of the company even when they're outside.

[00:08:49] [SPEAKER_01]: And Narayan Murti whom we all referred, we all started somewhere questioning, doubting

[00:08:56] [SPEAKER_01]: and thinking about it that how come he's trying to hold on so much.

[00:09:03] [SPEAKER_00]: Because the interesting part is that the board backed Mr. Sikha.

[00:09:08] [SPEAKER_00]: It's a good time for viewers to understand what exactly is the board of directors.

[00:09:13] [SPEAKER_00]: The board of directors are an appointed body that looks after the interest of all shareholders,

[00:09:19] [SPEAKER_00]: not shareholders like you, me who probably own shares in Infosys.

[00:09:23] [SPEAKER_00]: You could own 100 shares, I could own 10 shares but we are shareholders of the company

[00:09:26] [SPEAKER_00]: or we are the minority shareholders.

[00:09:28] [SPEAKER_00]: The board of directors acts as some kind of a buffer between the shareholders and the

[00:09:33] [SPEAKER_00]: executive management of the company.

[00:09:36] [SPEAKER_00]: They are there to ensure that the company is run in a sensible way, in a right way for

[00:09:42] [SPEAKER_00]: the benefit of all shareholders.

[00:09:44] [SPEAKER_00]: That is the job of the board of directors and whenever succession planning happens or

[00:09:48] [SPEAKER_00]: any corporate scandal happens which you would see in a lot of episodes of this

[00:09:52] [SPEAKER_00]: podcast, it's the board that always gets questioned and in this case the board backed Mr. Sikha.

[00:09:59] [SPEAKER_01]: In fact we were talking about the Raymond's case in one of the episodes also.

[00:10:04] [SPEAKER_01]: There also if you recall how independent directors called for a separate investigation so they

[00:10:10] [SPEAKER_01]: do step in and they do in fact we'll be talking about Axis Bank there too who had

[00:10:15] [SPEAKER_01]: a very interesting role.

[00:10:17] [SPEAKER_01]: So board was definitely backing Mr. Sikha and when Mr. Sikha resigned this was followed by

[00:10:25] [SPEAKER_01]: the chairman's resignation also eventually Mr. Sehshosai.

[00:10:29] [SPEAKER_01]: So and then Nandan Neelkani was brought in as the non-executive chairman.

[00:10:35] [SPEAKER_01]: So all that happened and interestingly Anupam, the Panaya case under the supervision of Mr.

[00:10:45] [SPEAKER_01]: Nandan Neelkani it was given a complete clean sheet for getting the right processes.

[00:10:51] [SPEAKER_01]: So actually speaking whether what was the problem only two people with whom the problem happens

[00:10:58] [SPEAKER_01]: will get to know but when it starts coming to a public platform unfortunately they

[00:11:04] [SPEAKER_01]: forget that while they are questioning based on their personal belief system it's

[00:11:13] [SPEAKER_01]: the organization that is suffering.

[00:11:15] [SPEAKER_00]: Always yeah.

[00:11:16] [SPEAKER_01]: Right so in this case also the exits when then we'll start coming in play more importantly

[00:11:23] [SPEAKER_01]: clients will start doubting the organization right if publicly the founder of the company

[00:11:30] [SPEAKER_01]: is questioning the organization on corporate governance practices goes without saying

[00:11:35] [SPEAKER_01]: that the clients will start doubting the organization right.

[00:11:38] [SPEAKER_00]: So who replaced Mr. Sikha?

[00:11:40] [SPEAKER_01]: In the interim COO took over the CEO role.

[00:11:45] [SPEAKER_01]: However Mr. Salil Parekh was eventually brought in and he's been in the system since then

[00:11:51] [SPEAKER_01]: and the organization currently again has stabilized and is growing the way it could have.

[00:11:57] [SPEAKER_01]: So that's where the whole thing is but what really stood out for me were two very distinct observations.

[00:12:05] [SPEAKER_01]: Number one that always remember that organization is way beyond individuals and every time senior

[00:12:16] [SPEAKER_01]: leaders when they forget this that's when they start washing dirty linen in the public

[00:12:22] [SPEAKER_01]: platform and whatever they are fighting for which is very dear to them the organization.

[00:12:28] [SPEAKER_01]: Actually they're damaging that organization and hence they should be very mindful about it.

[00:12:32] [SPEAKER_00]: Very interesting right I mean this is a company which is which was known still is known for the

[00:12:37] [SPEAKER_00]: corporate governance for their transparency for their accountability for having committees of

[00:12:41] [SPEAKER_00]: for every possible area within and beyond what is required by SEBI and yet it went through so many

[00:12:48] [SPEAKER_00]: I think at least one or two crises when it came to succession planning.

[00:12:53] [SPEAKER_00]: Thankfully now those episodes are over I'm pretty sure that Infosys has even learned

[00:12:57] [SPEAKER_00]: from everything that happened to their everything that happened to their leadership

[00:13:02] [SPEAKER_00]: during the succession plan and hopefully this will not happen again. Totally yeah let's go to

[00:13:07] [SPEAKER_00]: the second case study because that is even more interesting it has to with an organization that

[00:13:12] [SPEAKER_00]: probably listed around the time as Infosys Infosys listed I think in 92 or 93 and Access Bank

[00:13:17] [SPEAKER_00]: then known as UTI bank listed probably somewhere after that and Access Bank also

[00:13:24] [SPEAKER_00]: has a very interesting succession planning issue that happened a couple of times. Let's go back

[00:13:29] [SPEAKER_00]: in history and start from Mr. P. J. Nayak's term right because he was a chairman and CEO

[00:13:36] [SPEAKER_00]: the man who turned around this organization. Absolutely. Go on please. Yeah in fact

[00:13:42] [SPEAKER_01]: he's credited for doing too many things for the bank right so it was less than 50 branches

[00:13:48] [SPEAKER_01]: when Mr. Nayak took over right he grew it to 800 plus branches across the D. He also initiated

[00:13:55] [SPEAKER_01]: the international foray of Access Bank in fact you know you and I will remember

[00:14:01] [SPEAKER_01]: due to the US 64 crisis etc UTI bank. The name yeah. Yeah it was very doubted.

[00:14:07] [SPEAKER_00]: Correct exactly. One of the biggest I can't recall any bank leave alone private or public

[00:14:14] [SPEAKER_00]: that had such a huge makeover of their brand change the name because now you guys you might not

[00:14:20] [SPEAKER_00]: realize this right when a bank changes its name checkbooks have to be replaced. Totally. Everything

[00:14:25] [SPEAKER_00]: has to be replaced it's very different from you know a company changing its signage or their logos

[00:14:30] [SPEAKER_00]: and stuff this was one of the most interesting case studies in change of name and change in

[00:14:34] [SPEAKER_01]: identity go on please. Completely and he not just was instrumental in the name change period

[00:14:40] [SPEAKER_01]: as well from UTI bank to Access Bank he actually grew the bank to become the third largest private

[00:14:47] [SPEAKER_01]: bank in the country. So definitely a lot of credit went to him and he believed that

[00:14:55] [SPEAKER_01]: he understands the company well according to him he is very consciously grown leaders under him

[00:15:02] [SPEAKER_01]: and recommended you know a suitable candidate when the time for succession came. Right right

[00:15:10] [SPEAKER_01]: however the board did not agree to that so that's where there was a disconnect.

[00:15:17] [SPEAKER_00]: So if I remember correctly me the word happened was that Mr. Naik had recommended

[00:15:21] [SPEAKER_00]: names of internal candidates to the board. Remember folks that we said about how the

[00:15:25] [SPEAKER_00]: board of directors is important because they approve this so while there was a strong

[00:15:31] [SPEAKER_00]: understanding of business particular to specialize areas of work for these internal candidates

[00:15:37] [SPEAKER_00]: the board thought differently and there again a succession planning episode happened.

[00:15:42] [SPEAKER_01]: Walk us through that please. So the board believed that while the names that were

[00:15:47] [SPEAKER_01]: recommended they were definitely credible but the names lacked you know well rounded

[00:15:53] [SPEAKER_01]: experience we have to understand that a CEO's role goes way beyond just the business

[00:15:58] [SPEAKER_01]: leader's role right. So you need to know your business right but then there are so many other

[00:16:04] [SPEAKER_01]: elements when you're a CEO. So you know need to understand how to engage with regulators you

[00:16:09] [SPEAKER_01]: need to understand how to inspire employees you need to understand how to engage with customers

[00:16:14] [SPEAKER_01]: and again while we are talking about a bank a retail bank but its business is not just retail

[00:16:21] [SPEAKER_01]: right it has a corporate banking space also. So again engaging with customers of

[00:16:27] [SPEAKER_01]: both scale right at a retail scale as well as at a corporate scale. So there were too many

[00:16:32] [SPEAKER_01]: dimensions to a CEO that is required beyond knowing the business well or beyond knowing the industry

[00:16:39] [SPEAKER_01]: well. So what happened Anupam is the board felt that while the candidates are you know

[00:16:46] [SPEAKER_01]: perfect in terms of their subject matter expertise they were not well rounded

[00:16:52] [SPEAKER_01]: to be a CEO and hence they recommended the name of Ms. Shikha Sharma who was the MD and CEO of

[00:16:59] [SPEAKER_01]: ICC Prudential Life Insurance at that point in time. Fairly well rounded personality as for media

[00:17:06] [SPEAKER_01]: reports it shows that Mr. Nayak believed that she lacks industry exposure to some extent

[00:17:13] [SPEAKER_01]: which I wonder how because she was a career ICC Banker too and in fact she was a contender

[00:17:18] [SPEAKER_01]: to the top role before becoming the CEO of ICC Prudential Life. So she did have good banking

[00:17:25] [SPEAKER_01]: industry understanding she did have a CEO role experience already and in those days

[00:17:32] [SPEAKER_01]: a personality to reckon with right. So her entry was really celebrated on various counts

[00:17:41] [SPEAKER_01]: again as per variety of you know online offline flow of information that was coming out of Mr.

[00:17:50] [SPEAKER_01]: Nayak actually you know like I was saying he proposed his internal candidate so what happened

[00:17:57] [SPEAKER_01]: board voted against his recommendation and they preferred to go with Ms. Shikha Sharma.

[00:18:03] [SPEAKER_01]: So then Mr. Nayak chose to resign before his term so his term I think was ending somewhere

[00:18:09] [SPEAKER_01]: in June-July he chose to resign in the month of Jan and that whole episode suddenly hit headline

[00:18:16] [SPEAKER_01]: and he kept talking about how you know this was not in the best interest of the organization.

[00:18:23] [SPEAKER_00]: So again a boardroom drama that played out in the public eye. Precisely. Again about succession

[00:18:27] [SPEAKER_00]: planning very much like Infosys the incumbent has to leave he resigned and you know a lot of

[00:18:32] [SPEAKER_00]: things came out in the public in in the form of news reports which would have at least

[00:18:37] [SPEAKER_00]: had some impact on the bank's reputation. Precisely. Go on please. Yeah and then when

[00:18:43] [SPEAKER_01]: Shikha Sharma came an important point I want to bring about is during Mr. Nayak's tenure

[00:18:50] [SPEAKER_01]: NPAs of Axis Bank was one of the lowest and like I said and he was credited for many such

[00:18:57] [SPEAKER_01]: great fundamental you know changes or strengthening that he had done for the bank.

[00:19:04] [SPEAKER_01]: When Mr. when Shikha Sharma took over the bank grew and again it had its own set of

[00:19:10] [SPEAKER_01]: business ups and downs however conversations around NPA going up started you know rising

[00:19:20] [SPEAKER_01]: and eventually I think she opted for an early retirement and she also moved out.

[00:19:28] [SPEAKER_00]: So that's two high profile exits. That's P. J. Nayak and Vishalma.

[00:19:32] [SPEAKER_01]: What amazes me or I would say what what really got to my attention was the fact that

[00:19:39] [SPEAKER_01]: once if an organization has gone through a challenge like this it'll learn from it.

[00:19:46] [SPEAKER_01]: It'll invest in it to ensure that the company doesn't go through a similar kind of challenge

[00:19:51] [SPEAKER_01]: again. However fortunately in this case there was no drama with the entry of

[00:19:57] [SPEAKER_01]: new MD and CEO plus the bank is thriving right now so all is good for the bank.

[00:20:04] [SPEAKER_01]: But if it imagine again if it had to go through something similar I failed to understand

[00:20:12] [SPEAKER_01]: NPA my organizations are not consciously investing in succession planning.

[00:20:19] [SPEAKER_01]: A big challenge is that they look at it just like an event that whenever it'll happen we will

[00:20:24] [SPEAKER_00]: work towards it while it should be a continuous process. There's one important point for our listeners

[00:20:31] [SPEAKER_00]: to understand is that the difference between Infosys and Access Bank CEOs is that the bank CEO or bank

[00:20:39] [SPEAKER_00]: CEO any bank CEO in India has to be approved by the RBI Infosys of course free to choose

[00:20:44] [SPEAKER_00]: whoever they want in their transition otherwise a very different thing but banks in India

[00:20:48] [SPEAKER_00]: their chairman or whatever the top positions in the bank are usually approved by the RBI if I've

[00:20:54] [SPEAKER_00]: gotten that right and they go through there have been many instances in India's banking

[00:21:00] [SPEAKER_00]: history where the RBI has not approved the appointment of a certain CEO. In some cases they've

[00:21:06] [SPEAKER_00]: also put in an interim CEO when the bank goes under crisis so for a bank to have succession

[00:21:12] [SPEAKER_00]: planning issues in India it's a little bit rare because these things are planned in advance

[00:21:18] [SPEAKER_00]: getting RBI as approval and now and some of this happens behind the public's eye. You don't come

[00:21:23] [SPEAKER_00]: to know that a bank has sent a certain list to the RBI or the RBI has approved one so but when

[00:21:28] [SPEAKER_00]: this comes out and it plays out and it's happened twice in case of access first from Mr.

[00:21:33] [SPEAKER_00]: Nike to Mr. Sharma and second from Mr. Sharma to Mr. Chaudhary. So you know that I think was

[00:21:39] [SPEAKER_00]: it was quite interesting and the similarity to me in both the cases was that once this crisis was

[00:21:44] [SPEAKER_00]: put back and it was over and done with everything went back to normal.

[00:21:49] [SPEAKER_01]: Correct. The organization thrives like I keep saying it's something which is eternal right

[00:21:54] [SPEAKER_01]: and we forget that. We bring about our you know mortal human interest way ahead of the immortal

[00:22:02] [SPEAKER_01]: organization and that's the challenge. And one important thing is while the second time around

[00:22:10] [SPEAKER_01]: access banks you know new CEO coming in wasn't like I said wasn't stop me but the fact that

[00:22:19] [SPEAKER_01]: it was not well planned in advance is something we need to be mindful of and I think here

[00:22:26] [SPEAKER_01]: I would like to take names of two organizations whose succession planning I truly admire which is the

[00:22:33] [SPEAKER_01]: ICSA bank and HDFC bank right both of them. Mr. Aditya Puri was at the helm for such a long time

[00:22:39] [SPEAKER_01]: right but the transition was so very smooth and the organization is not at all suffering.

[00:22:47] [SPEAKER_01]: ICSA bank also succession planning from Mr. Kamat to Chandakochir was very very

[00:22:53] [SPEAKER_01]: smooth. Even Miss Kochir's exit while it was talked about heavily but more importantly Mr.

[00:23:01] [SPEAKER_01]: Sandeep Bakshi's entry again it was pretty seamless and from the group companies right so

[00:23:07] [SPEAKER_01]: it is important for organizations to take a slightly larger than life perspective than going

[00:23:14] [SPEAKER_00]: by personal interest. And even in case of infosys it's compared to like a TCS their succession

[00:23:20] [SPEAKER_00]: planning was also precisely better. We do let's get into the final part of our episode

[00:23:26] [SPEAKER_00]: and talk about the key learnings from this okay like what would you say are the common lessons

[00:23:33] [SPEAKER_01]: from both of these episodes for our listeners to take away from. So first and foremost we need

[00:23:40] [SPEAKER_01]: to remember that CEOs are in that role for a particular period of time. The exits happen the

[00:23:51] [SPEAKER_01]: reason of exit can be anything it could be unfortunately it could even be death it could

[00:23:55] [SPEAKER_01]: also be choice of them moving for a better opportunity in fact the research report shows

[00:24:01] [SPEAKER_01]: that average tenure of CEOs in India is three and a half years. So broadly we know that

[00:24:08] [SPEAKER_01]: that's the kind of direction. So organizations need to really have and here board plays a very

[00:24:14] [SPEAKER_01]: critical role a good succession planning framework in place and when I say framework and I'm not

[00:24:21] [SPEAKER_01]: only referring to the CEO role CEO minus one at least that role there has to be a good shadow

[00:24:31] [SPEAKER_01]: you know a role parallely running extremely important in fact couple of companies whom we

[00:24:37] [SPEAKER_01]: advise I have seen that play out beautifully well. So when one of the CEOs choose to move out

[00:24:43] [SPEAKER_01]: and it's a listed company I'm referring to there was not even a single jerk in the organization

[00:24:50] [SPEAKER_01]: that what happened so that's the beauty of transition that happens. The one thing that

[00:24:55] [SPEAKER_00]: I'm getting from what you're saying is that grooming is important none of this happens overnight

[00:24:59] [SPEAKER_00]: this has to start at least maybe one two three years before the actual transition the actual

[00:25:04] [SPEAKER_01]: succession takes place. Totally so two key messages here number one you need to start

[00:25:09] [SPEAKER_01]: planning in advance and there has to be a structure or a framework for succession planning

[00:25:15] [SPEAKER_01]: in place then when you're training people or grooming people like you said for the role

[00:25:23] [SPEAKER_01]: don't forget that a CEO's role or a CXO's role go way beyond knowing their business or

[00:25:31] [SPEAKER_01]: knowing their activity right. What is called subject matter expertise or technical expertise

[00:25:36] [SPEAKER_01]: absolutely much more than that. Precisely so that's definitely a must you can't reach this level if

[00:25:42] [SPEAKER_01]: you don't know your subject matter but then the plus plus the essential skills what we call

[00:25:48] [SPEAKER_01]: they have to be there and if by any chance any of that is missing organizations must invest in

[00:25:54] [SPEAKER_00]: broad basing that. One example of a skill that comes from a man's consensus building within

[00:26:01] [SPEAKER_00]: the organization you have to be a people's person when you reach that role what do you say about

[00:26:05] [SPEAKER_01]: that. So not just within the organization right outside as well all stakeholders

[00:26:11] [SPEAKER_01]: and very important you have to take people along when you take such a large role yes in that

[00:26:20] [SPEAKER_01]: one has to again be cognizant which we are assuming that at that level they'll be cognizant that they

[00:26:24] [SPEAKER_01]: don't get drawn into hence pleasing people it's not about pleasing people it's about

[00:26:31] [SPEAKER_01]: building consensus and the two things are very different. Two specific aspects here that I want

[00:26:35] [SPEAKER_00]: to talk about I want you to mention out here first internal versus external candidates because

[00:26:41] [SPEAKER_00]: that's always a hot topic for all you know boards and second is actually the role of the board in

[00:26:46] [SPEAKER_00]: this. Let's start with the role of the board because in both examples today both of them played

[00:26:50] [SPEAKER_00]: a very key role so first the role of the board in succession planning what do you say about that.

[00:26:56] [SPEAKER_01]: Extremely critical right and they have to ensure that it's a critical matter of NRC

[00:27:02] [SPEAKER_01]: the nomination and remuneration committee that the succession planning is the whole framework

[00:27:09] [SPEAKER_01]: is defined and the mapping is in place. If a board is not doing that I think it's a challenge

[00:27:16] [SPEAKER_01]: and they have to remember it cannot be event based it has to be a process. So that's the

[00:27:22] [SPEAKER_01]: biggest role that the board can play also board has to take another step ahead because

[00:27:31] [SPEAKER_01]: as board members we don't have exposure to what's exactly happening in the company so a lot can be

[00:27:37] [SPEAKER_01]: shown on paper or on slides as they say but actual reality can be different. So again investing

[00:27:44] [SPEAKER_01]: slightly more time and trying to get to know and engage and interact with the minus one levels

[00:27:52] [SPEAKER_01]: to actually experience that what's on play papers what's on slide is actually in the making

[00:27:57] [SPEAKER_00]: as well is very critical. My suggestion to our viewers would be that if you want to know

[00:28:03] [SPEAKER_00]: what exactly the NRC the nomination and remuneration committee does specifically in terms of succession

[00:28:09] [SPEAKER_00]: planning please pick up an annual report and if you're in PDF just do a control find on succession

[00:28:15] [SPEAKER_00]: and you'll find the philosophy out there we are in the year 2024 not in 2004 not in 1994

[00:28:21] [SPEAKER_00]: succession planning has to be mentioned as you know whatever the policy is of the company

[00:28:26] [SPEAKER_00]: will be mentioned in an annual report and you can know the good companies which believe in

[00:28:31] [SPEAKER_00]: corporate governance and transparency from their philosophy and framework on succession planning

[00:28:35] [SPEAKER_00]: it will be mentioned in the annual report. Should be. Let's move to internal candidate versus

[00:28:41] [SPEAKER_00]: external candidate because this to me is a fascinating discussion first there's no consensus

[00:28:46] [SPEAKER_00]: out here. Get it. We have enough examples of external candidates doing really well

[00:28:50] [SPEAKER_00]: internal candidates also doing really well both the bank that you mentioned ICSA bank and

[00:28:54] [SPEAKER_00]: HDFC bank the people who replaced the outgoing CEO were have been there in the company for quite

[00:29:00] [SPEAKER_00]: some time. ICSA banks and the Bakshi in case of HDFC bank Sashita Jyadishan have been around

[00:29:05] [SPEAKER_00]: so what's your view on this internal versus external debate? There's no right answer

[00:29:11] [SPEAKER_01]: you know like you rightly pointed out that it's pretty much you know either can work either

[00:29:19] [SPEAKER_01]: may fail right what is important is the cultural fit. Cultural fitment definitely needs to be

[00:29:28] [SPEAKER_01]: evaluated and again that's one of the important roles of NRC to pay attention to that the candidate

[00:29:35] [SPEAKER_01]: which is in question what is the cultural fitment that the candidate brings to the table and if

[00:29:42] [SPEAKER_01]: there is even slight disconnect in that I would say that should be looked upon as a red flag.

[00:29:49] [SPEAKER_01]: Whether it is a family owned business whether it is a professionally managed business whether it is

[00:29:54] [SPEAKER_01]: listed whether it is unlisted whatever be the size scale anything but if cultural mismatch is there

[00:30:02] [SPEAKER_01]: definitely you know it's not going to last longer so that's the first thing organizations

[00:30:08] [SPEAKER_01]: should pay attention to and the second thing that they need to pay attention to is

[00:30:16] [SPEAKER_01]: you know some homework one will have to do in advance as well right so what is it that you're

[00:30:21] [SPEAKER_01]: expecting from this role and then define like I think Axis Bank did it right when they said that

[00:30:28] [SPEAKER_01]: from this role we are expecting a well-rounded professional and if the internal candidate

[00:30:34] [SPEAKER_01]: is not meeting that requirement we will bring somebody from outside and then you know give

[00:30:40] [SPEAKER_01]: them the environment which is conducive for it to work so that's also very important having clarity

[00:30:46] [SPEAKER_01]: in terms of what is it that you want from the candidate because for every organization what a

[00:30:52] [SPEAKER_01]: tech led organization requires in a CEO is very different from what a you know a textile

[00:30:58] [SPEAKER_01]: you know company needs from a CEO the requirements are different so that clarity is

[00:31:04] [SPEAKER_00]: very critical let's wrap up me to challenges and learning now when it comes to succession

[00:31:10] [SPEAKER_00]: planning in India there are some inbuilt you know very challenges or hurdles or obstacles

[00:31:15] [SPEAKER_01]: what are they first and foremost in case of family-owned businesses and in fact in even

[00:31:23] [SPEAKER_01]: in case of profession professionally run organization people fear letting go right so

[00:31:31] [SPEAKER_01]: they have their own fears in terms of what if this next person you know doesn't give me the kind of

[00:31:40] [SPEAKER_01]: you know role that I'm currently playing predecessor is always very of you know who's

[00:31:46] [SPEAKER_01]: going to replace him or her next because that to some extent also defines his or her role in

[00:31:54] [SPEAKER_01]: the system and in both organization whether it is family-owned or professionally run this challenge

[00:32:01] [SPEAKER_00]: becomes very critical the second challenge I believe is how India compares in succession

[00:32:06] [SPEAKER_00]: planning to the west where I think it's more institutionalized what do you think yeah it's

[00:32:09] [SPEAKER_01]: very institutionalized in fact all these proxy advisory firms etc are also very mature in those

[00:32:16] [SPEAKER_01]: and active mature and active you're right in those economies and hence the conversation around these

[00:32:23] [SPEAKER_01]: are you know very are at a different scale and a different level however it's not that you know

[00:32:32] [SPEAKER_01]: countries in the west they don't have such a challenge in the modern battles there also

[00:32:35] [SPEAKER_01]: we've seen that there too right so so these challenges I feel the third and the most

[00:32:42] [SPEAKER_01]: important challenge hence is the humans inability to process that you know they are not bigger than

[00:32:52] [SPEAKER_01]: the organization the organizations are way bigger than them and the day you know the leadership or

[00:32:59] [SPEAKER_01]: the board members and all of these critical decision makers in an organization they start

[00:33:05] [SPEAKER_01]: making decisions with organizational lens and not from the individual lens I feel

[00:33:12] [SPEAKER_01]: the whole succession planning outcome will be very different some learnings and takeaways for our

[00:33:18] [SPEAKER_01]: listeners to wrap up this episode please three key learnings number one don't treat

[00:33:25] [SPEAKER_01]: succession planning as an event it should be an ongoing process with clear mapping of roles

[00:33:31] [SPEAKER_01]: and with clear definition of the skills and the knowledge and the expertise that you require

[00:33:38] [SPEAKER_01]: learning number two always you know go beyond your personal interest look at the organizational

[00:33:47] [SPEAKER_01]: interest and you will you know be able to make decision more objectively than getting engaged

[00:33:55] [SPEAKER_01]: into it in an emotional manner and getting into the courtroom drama and public spats

[00:34:00] [SPEAKER_01]: the third thing look for cultural fitment anybody who's able to culturally fit into the organization

[00:34:10] [SPEAKER_01]: will be able to build consensus with all the other stakeholders and grow the organization

[00:34:16] [SPEAKER_00]: which is the primary objective and folks that is a wrap on this episode of repetition matter

[00:34:21] [SPEAKER_00]: where we spoke about succession planning for more such episodes as always please subscribe

[00:34:25] [SPEAKER_00]: to our channel me too thank you so much for being so nice